From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-4985-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 2434 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Jul 2003 10:13:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 21148 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 10:13:37 -0000
From:	Svyatogor <svyatogor@gentoo.org>
To:	gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200307250813.18153.pauldv@gentoo.org>
References: <BAY7-F605euwdUTaGmv0000fd76@hotmail.com>
	 <1059098497.23507.6.camel@vertigo>
	 <20030725034725.GA21977@force.stwing.upenn.edu>
	 <200307250813.18153.pauldv@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-i+CI8iQg/cQkkI3UDYbY"
Message-Id: <1059130409.2482.7.camel@sergey.swdevelopers.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date:	25 Jul 2003 13:53:30 +0300
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage?
X-Archives-Salt: 00ca10b4-6ea5-402b-aedf-04ed2bd24fa7
X-Archives-Hash: fad200b6dd56ced1ba52e5d4864cff44

--=-i+CI8iQg/cQkkI3UDYbY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=F7 ?? 25.07.2003, =D7 09:13, Paul de Vrieze =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4:
> To make it clear.
>=20
> winex is not GPL, I believe it has a MIT-X license.=20
No, they are AFPL (Alladin Free Public License), furthermore they have
the right to change it any time they like and make it coled source or
whatever else.

I personally do not like Transgamming's way of doing things either, but
there nothing that can be done about it. Wine made mistake of letting
Winex-forge, by choosing a wrong license and it is too late o fix it.

Transgamming asked us to remove the package and we are gonna do so,
unless someone gives us a very good reason, why we shouldn't do it.
(When I say a *good* reason - I mean it). First of all we have to
respect their request, no matter if we like them or not. Secondly, if we
are not going to remove the ebuild, they might close their public CVS
once and for all, and we do not want to be the cause of that.

P.S. You can read their license here:
http://www.transgaming.com/license.php?source=3D1


--=20
Let the Force be with us!
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@gentoo.org>
Pulic Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~sergey/gentoo-gpg

--=-i+CI8iQg/cQkkI3UDYbY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: =?koi8-r?Q?=FC=D4=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=DE=C1=D3=D4=D8?=
	=?koi8-r?Q?_=D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=D1?=
	=?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=C1=CE=C1?=
	=?koi8-r?Q?_=C3=C9=C6=D2=CF=D7=CF=CA?=
	=?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=D8=C0?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/IQwpbYNN+aDJgscRAhHHAJ0YVXwUqztuTMTlzCSOMVItqtlpdwCfTTgB
Qp7b+bD55k4HRNW/I8GeeoI=
=s84p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-i+CI8iQg/cQkkI3UDYbY--