From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28715 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Jul 2003 20:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19830 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 20:52:23 -0000 From: Ned Ludd Reply-To: solar@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Developer (Hardened) Message-Id: <1058388708.14372.1241.camel@simple> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4- Date: 16 Jul 2003 16:51:48 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: flag-o-matic.eclass X-Archives-Salt: 2bea439e-468f-4d48-b38c-33a507a645eb X-Archives-Hash: b6b597e28785794c0d2de1b5559f6ac1 Recently support was added to portage for ASFLAGS LDFLAGS, and at this point I'm going to need to start filtering out some C[XX]FLAGS LDFLAGS. Mainly when "filter-flag -fPIC" is used I need to make sure that -yet_dyn(feature that enables -fPIC) is pulled out of all the flags thus ensuring that the program builds and links correctly. Anyway due to the nature of this change I'm looking for a few pairs of eyes to look over the code and give some feedback before it gets committed to portage. the code http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/flag-o-matic.eclass-1.22.diff -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux Developer (Hardened) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list