From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 894 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Jun 2003 12:45:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5057 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2003 12:45:57 -0000 From: foser To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030625034229.GB9182@gonzo.peterjohanson.com> References: <20030625013328.GA10762@inventor.gentoo.org> <200306250502.32174.tclark@telia.com> <20030625034229.GB9182@gonzo.peterjohanson.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1056545329.362.2.camel@rivendell> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 25 Jun 2003 14:48:50 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *IMPORTANT* top-level management structure! X-Archives-Salt: d57f98ef-d7f5-4cbe-87a5-eaea6e9f9db6 X-Archives-Hash: edbb225938dd92bb6e92570c17adb0d1 On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 05:42, Peter Johanson wrote: > i know there has been strong movement to move more things off of -core > and to -dev, as well as reducing non development issues to -user. > Continuing this effort, and keeping -core for truely important issues, > (konwn vulnerabilities like the KDE one from a while back) is important. > It should be stressed that -dev should be considered *the* place for > development mails, and -core for truly *core* specific issues. This is exactly the problem of -dev, that replies go totally off topic. Despite the validity of the points made they do not matter in this discussion and partly have been discussed before . - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list