From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-3898-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 24115 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Jun 2003 10:24:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 11683 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 10:24:06 -0000
From: FRLinux <frlinux@frlinux.net>
Reply-To: frlinux@frlinux.net
To: John Mylchreest <johnm@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1056243156.32694.3.camel@johnm.willow.local>
References: <20030622004442.GA27796@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1056243156.32694.3.camel@johnm.willow.local>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: evil empire
Message-Id: <1056277428.4192.2.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 
Date: 22 Jun 2003 11:23:48 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] drobbins mass mark stable
X-Archives-Salt: bd0e8705-0de8-4af0-94da-75c33ef78aea
X-Archives-Hash: 949bccedc80f71429837a039247ea888

Afaik, winex with their brand new release (3.1) fixed this issue, as
read on the release notes but i haven't tested that.

Steph

On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 01:52, John Mylchreest wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is anyone aware of a winex fix for glibc 2.3.2 yet? I
> would be wary stabilising glibc until it is (This doesn't count to the
> current accidental marking) as its quite the major package.



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list