From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26306 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Jun 2003 00:53:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12187 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 00:53:23 -0000 From: John Mylchreest To: Jon Portnoy Cc: Jay Goodman Tamboli , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030622004949.GA1735@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <20030622004442.GA27796@localhost.localdomain> <20030622004710.GA1691@cerberus.oppresses.us> <20030622004949.GA1735@cerberus.oppresses.us> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ESN/bkktdlNPtaJ8HXa/" Message-Id: <1056243199.32694.5.camel@johnm.willow.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 22 Jun 2003 01:53:19 +0100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2003 00:54:26.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[D44A9140:01C33858] Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] drobbins mass mark stable X-Archives-Salt: bb45ef34-4470-4f64-98f9-8de0f08fca20 X-Archives-Hash: 2151e5a48d8e4985a58a83e33b1dcacc --=-ESN/bkktdlNPtaJ8HXa/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 01:49, Jon Portnoy wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:47:10PM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:44:42PM -0400, Jay Goodman Tamboli wrote: > > > I just did a sync (server scrolled offscreen. logged > > > anywhere?), and I notice lots of upgrades, including glibc > > > to 2.3.2-r1 (from 2.3.1-r4). I started checking some of the > > > CVS logs, and at least for glibc, man, and fileutils, the > > > change of KEYWORD ~x86 to x86 was done by drobbins as part > > > of "amd64" fixes. I'd like to be careful about a glibc > > > upgrade, so can someone confirm that all these changes are > > > intentional and correct? > > >=20 > > > /jgt > > > --=20 > > > I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest. -- John Keats > >=20 > > No, this was an accident. drobbins is currently fixing it. > >=20 >=20 > Let me amend that: glibc 2.3.2 is going to be stable on x86 from here on=20 > out. There is no other choice - reverting to 2.3.1 would break more=20 > things than it'd fix. please ignore my comment about not stabilising 2.3.2 in my previous mail if this is the case ;) --=20 John Mylchreest. Gentoo Linux Developer Gentoo Linux: http://www.gentoo.org Public Key: gpg --recv-keys 0xEAB9E721 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xEAB9E721 Key fingerprint:0670 E5E4 F461 806B 860A 2245 A40E 72EB EAB9 E721 --=-ESN/bkktdlNPtaJ8HXa/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+9P3/pA5y6+q55yERAlrMAKCbqX3pRGLqjACDP5JOeouUoFv7ogCfbPYJ TnAy+mCiyiIZIKa/68Vg5PQ= =+VeL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ESN/bkktdlNPtaJ8HXa/--