From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2574 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Jun 2003 00:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13708 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 00:52:39 -0000 From: John Mylchreest To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030622004442.GA27796@localhost.localdomain> References: <20030622004442.GA27796@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xF5dP8CueP93yWN1H/IJ" Message-Id: <1056243156.32694.3.camel@johnm.willow.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 22 Jun 2003 01:52:36 +0100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2003 00:53:43.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAAD6870:01C33858] Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] drobbins mass mark stable X-Archives-Salt: 27efe563-d7ca-4b53-991a-16c8c130e20b X-Archives-Hash: 70b283fd7ac49e71b3f7b73852a00529 --=-xF5dP8CueP93yWN1H/IJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Out of curiosity, is anyone aware of a winex fix for glibc 2.3.2 yet? I would be wary stabilising glibc until it is (This doesn't count to the current accidental marking) as its quite the major package. Apparently it works with nptl but the 2.5.72 sysctl.h is syntactically incorrect for gcc-3.3 (at least), easy fix mind. can anyone clarify? I know this probably isnt the place to ask this, although it was kind of on-topic. On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 01:44, Jay Goodman Tamboli wrote: > I just did a sync (server scrolled offscreen. logged > anywhere?), and I notice lots of upgrades, including glibc > to 2.3.2-r1 (from 2.3.1-r4). I started checking some of the > CVS logs, and at least for glibc, man, and fileutils, the > change of KEYWORD ~x86 to x86 was done by drobbins as part > of "amd64" fixes. I'd like to be careful about a glibc > upgrade, so can someone confirm that all these changes are > intentional and correct? >=20 > /jgt --=20 John Mylchreest. Gentoo Linux Developer Gentoo Linux: http://www.gentoo.org Public Key: gpg --recv-keys 0xEAB9E721 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xEAB9E721 Key fingerprint:0670 E5E4 F461 806B 860A 2245 A40E 72EB EAB9 E721 --=-xF5dP8CueP93yWN1H/IJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+9P3UpA5y6+q55yERAie6AKCWrf96ZIMtreXgm43xyKoQGr/8QQCffAyY hhpUXZbF5Mm7SY4c1xB/IUw= =MSGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xF5dP8CueP93yWN1H/IJ--