From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4101 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Jun 2003 14:49:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21210 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 14:49:09 -0000 From: Todd Berman Reply-To: tberman@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1054738001.4557.3.camel@devweb> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 04 Jun 2003 10:46:41 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mono eBuild X-Archives-Salt: 407142de-9c81-48d0-ba09-712bbf82b1b1 X-Archives-Hash: e0717e0a1919cfca9328524e89479a83 ive spoken to foser briefly about mono and .net issues in general. right now, mono-debugger .2.2 wont build against mono-.24, hopefully with the upcoming (soon) mono release this will all be fixed. Now, I cant speak for all the gentoo developers, or for gentoo itself, but as a gentoo developer, I am committed to fully supporting mono in any and all ways possible. Hopefully over the next couple of weeks foser will put monodoc into portage, and other mono improvements :) --Todd On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 04:37, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Are there any plans to enhance the Mono eBuild, for instance to install > jay or add the mono-debugger either to a separate (new) eBuild or to > the mono one? > > Thanks, > Sebastian -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list