From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4476 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Jun 2003 21:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10086 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2003 21:48:15 -0000 From: foser To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <007d01c32935$2c700450$1b2a10ac@victoria> References: <007d01c32935$2c700450$1b2a10ac@victoria> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1054590273.8196.9.camel@rivendell> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Jun 2003 23:44:33 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in sawfish-2.0 source X-Archives-Salt: 5046b9b8-e7b7-4b52-b228-d812a0920a8e X-Archives-Hash: 6bf4dd748dfbfcb0785f3d94c50fefd2 On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 20:31, Tobias J. Schwinger wrote: > sawfish-2.0 didn't want to compile on my configuration. If you wanted the latest sawfish for gtk+-2.0 you should install 1.3, that's really the latest version and it has a better gtk version check. Sawfish for gtk+ 2 had some weird versioning jumps. The check was ok around the time sawfish-2.0 was released around the time gtk+-2.0 hit the streets, but isn't correct anymore with gtk+-2.2 in the tree. Your check isn't completely correct either, cause sawfish will work with gtk+-2.0 just fine (it checks the minor version no.). I removed the 2.0 ebuild. - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list