Re: [gentoo-dev] Media-music category

[Todd Berman <tberman@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]

Just to preface this, I have no personal objections to this move at all.
However, I think you should wait a bit more than 2 days for any possible
objections/suggestions. Now, I'm not saying lets wait a month to make
sure no one has anything different/better to say about it. But a wait of
4-5 days does seem somewhat appropriate.

I could be wrong through :)

--Todd
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 11:11, rob holland wrote:
> All,
> 
> Unless anyone has strong objects with us using media-music for now, I think 
> we should go ahead. Surely reducing the amount of packages in media-sound 
> has to be a good thing? Media-music might not be perfect but its still a 
> step in the right direction. Rather than us spending the next few months 
> pondering on the perfect name..
> 
> We can always change it later. Like I say, I think media-music is better 
> than media-sound for things we've said we're going to move.
> 
> Unless anyone voices a strong objection (and backs it up ;) in the next two 
> days we'll go ahead with the move using media-music.
> 
> rob
> 
> --
> 
> robh@gentoo.org / robh:irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]