Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes

[Edward Duffy <eduffy@cs.clemson.edu>]

d'oh! I feel stupid.  So it's about 20-25% of the ebuild that use that
depend on it...still seems kind of low.

On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 14:12, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> On 26/05/2003 at 13:18:44(-0400), Edward Duffy used 0.8Kbytes just to say:
> > On the one ebuild I've sumbitted, the dev that committed it added a line
> > for
> > DEPEND="virtual/glibc"
> > 
> > What wouldn't depend on glibc, isn't that a given?  A quick scan
> > through the portage directory turns up:
> > # find /usr/portage/ -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs grep "virtual/glibc" 
> >    | wc -l
> >    1982
> > # find /usr/portage/ -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs grep -v "virtual/glibc" 
> >    | wc -l
> > 406821
> 
> This gives you the number of LINES that do not have virtual/glibc, not the
> files that don't. You'd want something like:
> 
> # find /usr/portage -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs -i sh -c 'grep -q "virtual/glibc" {} || echo {}'
> 
> However, since you already have the number of packages that DO have the line -
> you only need to substract it from the total number of ebuilds.
> 
> # find /usr/portage -iname '*.ebuild' | wc -l
>    8587


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list