From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-3103-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 2926 invoked by uid 1002); 16 May 2003 12:00:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 32302 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 12:00:55 -0000
From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay <dhruba@codewordt.co.uk>
Reply-To: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20030516022031.57157e45.spider@gentoo.org>
References: <20030516022031.57157e45.spider@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1053086453.22966.10.camel@wolf.codewordt.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4- 
Date: 16 May 2003 13:00:53 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [WIP]  gcc 3.3
X-Archives-Salt: 298eb976-0d06-4305-8f31-7173571b074b
X-Archives-Hash: c59e28b11e45cd9a9a4bc1aaffa00efd

On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 01:20, Spider wrote:
> hi folks,
> here is an initial ebuild of gcc 3.3, it doesn't contain propolice
> patch, and I haven't checked it with "build" or other flags except the
> default. (its slow to build on this machine)

There is an ebuild for it on bugzilla and one here and some on forums
too.  Have you used any of these as a definitive base or is this a new
creation?

Also, is there any sign of this being entered into hardmasked or testig
state on portage?

I'd be quite keen on testing it out since I have had my fair share of
pentium4 problems and am desperately hoping an upgrade of gcc will sort
them out.

Pardon my ignorance but have all these patches been commented out to
prevent resultant problems or because they are no longer necessary?

Also, as a short note to those devs making a cflags guide to say that
the optimisation options have changed somewhat for gcc 3.3; an example
being -fomit-frame-pointer is now enabled by -O3 (taken from online
manual).

With regards
Dhruba Bandopadhyay


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list