From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-3103-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 2926 invoked by uid 1002); 16 May 2003 12:00:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32302 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 12:00:55 -0000 From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay <dhruba@codewordt.co.uk> Reply-To: gentoo-user@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030516022031.57157e45.spider@gentoo.org> References: <20030516022031.57157e45.spider@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1053086453.22966.10.camel@wolf.codewordt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4- Date: 16 May 2003 13:00:53 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [WIP] gcc 3.3 X-Archives-Salt: 298eb976-0d06-4305-8f31-7173571b074b X-Archives-Hash: c59e28b11e45cd9a9a4bc1aaffa00efd On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 01:20, Spider wrote: > hi folks, > here is an initial ebuild of gcc 3.3, it doesn't contain propolice > patch, and I haven't checked it with "build" or other flags except the > default. (its slow to build on this machine) There is an ebuild for it on bugzilla and one here and some on forums too. Have you used any of these as a definitive base or is this a new creation? Also, is there any sign of this being entered into hardmasked or testig state on portage? I'd be quite keen on testing it out since I have had my fair share of pentium4 problems and am desperately hoping an upgrade of gcc will sort them out. Pardon my ignorance but have all these patches been commented out to prevent resultant problems or because they are no longer necessary? Also, as a short note to those devs making a cflags guide to say that the optimisation options have changed somewhat for gcc 3.3; an example being -fomit-frame-pointer is now enabled by -O3 (taken from online manual). With regards Dhruba Bandopadhyay -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list