From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14145 invoked by uid 1002); 5 May 2003 18:41:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15216 invoked from network); 5 May 2003 18:41:32 -0000 From: Wesley Leggette To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <3EB65A2A.2080202@foser.dyn.warande.net> References: <1051956324.4516.21.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1052064323.1707.7.camel@cyr.kaylix.net> <1052071932.4478.7.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1052092114.7910.10.camel@cyr.kaylix.net> <3EB65A2A.2080202@foser.dyn.warande.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1052159488.12509.1.camel@cyr.kaylix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1- Date: 05 May 2003 13:31:29 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Init replacement X-Archives-Salt: 1e326e26-802a-4aad-98ce-def5dc0c757f X-Archives-Hash: d2f3186f1f04720e5efe846540109b01 On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 07:33, foser wrote: > Wesley Leggette wrote: > > > As for the other scripting languages you mention, I don't think that's > > relavant because nobody's suggesting converting to python or haskell. As > > far as I can tell, the suggestion is to use XML. That's why I brought it > > back up. > > > > I'd say all of this dicussion is not relevant, the Gentoo init is not > questioned here. The guy just tried to promote his new init system and > that shouldn't have been done on this ml, it does not belong here. Don't > tie this in vs. the Gentoo init system, that works fine as it is and > maybe in the future something better pops up. pinit wasn't meant as a > replacement, don't start discussing it here like it was. > > - foser I agree whole heartedly. It's just an idea some guy came up with. It's not the end of the world. > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Wesley Leggette -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list