On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 16:57, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 Apr 2003 15:26, Dan Armak wrote:
> >  The second will facilitate quick acceptance of user-submitted ebuilds
> > in some way - probably drawing upon the submitters in one way or
> > another.
> 
> I'm more than willing to maintain ebuilds I submit.
> 

Same here. What are the requirements for being a maintainer?
I don't think one has to make the newest version available ASAP.
This f.ex. didn't happen with drip - which was why I created a new
version myself.

I think people who submit ebuilds should automacally be added as
maintainer of the ebuild. If they contribute with a newer version of a
given ebuild - then they should be added as maintainer - keeping the old
maintainer too. 

It's a Community distro and I don't think anyone will mind - as long as
it's all build on volutarity - ie. make a newer version if you like -
don't if you don't.
-- 
Regards,
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@vsen.dk - http://www.vsen.dk

Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent. 
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child 
who is carrying a .38.