From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30971 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Apr 2003 06:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 3284 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2003 06:31:27 -0000 From: Dave Nellans Reply-To: dnellans@cs.utah.edu To: Peter Ruskin Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200304170332.01694.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> References: <1050538917.7371.12.camel@malfus> <200304162015.33277.sethbc@gentoo.org> <200304170332.01694.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1TYt1/N/3tolS6HIv7r0" Organization: none Message-Id: <1050563063.5532.0.camel@malfus> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4- Date: 17 Apr 2003 01:04:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev's updating changlogs X-Archives-Salt: 9524cf4c-c7e7-44c4-97e2-ba468a75f528 X-Archives-Hash: 1bbe51258fa66369df5ac196d45eda7a --=-1TYt1/N/3tolS6HIv7r0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable come to think of it i printed to a postscript file on 1.0.3 as well without any problem (that is the only kind of "printing" i do) dave On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 20:32, Peter Ruskin wrote: > On Thursday 17 Apr 2003 01:15, Seth Chandler wrote: > > the change today was becuase 1.0.3 doesn't print...period >=20 > What do you mean Seth? I have 1.0.3 and can print. >=20 > Peter --=20 --=-1TYt1/N/3tolS6HIv7r0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+nlH3dtkLPRim+bkRAmLSAKCKNPL341Cdw2gwHy/0vrAbN4FDGgCggsHo SQi3Cgg0PRIzYILzugyFKno= =vsIX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1TYt1/N/3tolS6HIv7r0--