From: Dave Nellans <dnellans@cs.utah.edu>
To: sethbc@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, avenj@gentoo.org, seemant@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev's updating changlogs
Date: 16 Apr 2003 18:58:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050541106.7371.19.camel@malfus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304162015.33277.sethbc@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2168 bytes --]
i hear you on putting the effort into the ebuilds and appriciate it very
much! just a one liner for and update is often more than sufficient to
explain what is going on and appease vicious guys like me ;)
dave
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 18:15, Seth Chandler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> this is my package and i added openoffice-bin 1.1_beta which was supposed to
> be masked, i personally don't comment out things that are supposed to be
> masked, i made an error and it was ~arch
>
> then i added 1.0.3 which i should have done a changelog for, but i've been
> really busy with the actual from source version...
>
> the change today was becuase 1.0.3 doesn't print...period
>
> the openoffice guys made a booboo, and i've been working on getting patches
>
> changelogs are key to our development, but i'm going to put most of my effort
> into the packages, which is IMO where they belong...i'll update the
> changelogs within a week (after all this printing stuff is sorted out)...
>
> and the 'upgrade downgrade game' is more like the "working version game"
>
> seth
>
> On Wednesday 16 April 2003 20:21, Dave Nellans wrote:
> > sorry to harp on this but after an emerge sync this afternoon
> > openoffice-bin wanted to upgrade to 1.1_beta after it has already been
> > upgraded once, then downgraded to 1.0.3. yet in the Changelog there is
> > still NO entry past 1.0.2 from late january.
> >
> > could devleopers PLEASE follow the procedure and update the changlogs?
> > while i appriciate the ebuild work, its quite annoying to see major
> > upgrades like this with zero documentation about it explaining why its
> > bouncing back and forth between versions...
> >
> > sorry for a bit of rant but i think its important to update the
> > Changelogs so mere users of the package know why they're playing the
> > upgrade/downgrade game constantly!
> >
> > dave
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+nfIl7TKExlfwaNURAgFtAJ4yExZx6kBKy9WTc4jfR6pwGLAS1ACeI7yy
> 9wdAnBa92C58FO7GviTTkJU=
> =MYG2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 0:21 [gentoo-dev] dev's updating changlogs Dave Nellans
2003-04-17 0:15 ` Seth Chandler
2003-04-17 0:58 ` Dave Nellans [this message]
2003-04-17 2:32 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-04-17 7:04 ` Dave Nellans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1050541106.7371.19.camel@malfus \
--to=dnellans@cs.utah.edu \
--cc=avenj@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=seemant@gentoo.org \
--cc=sethbc@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox