From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10243 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Apr 2003 15:47:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12968 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2003 15:47:35 -0000 From: Benjamin Podszun To: azarah@gentoo.org Cc: Hasse Hagen Johansen , Gentoo-Dev In-Reply-To: <1050190221.4224.67.camel@nosferatu.lan> References: <1050174571.1279.17.camel@blafasel> <200304121524.19816.brian@mdrx.com> <1050179520.1274.24.camel@blafasel> <1050179881.3930.9.camel@nexus6.musikcheck.dk> <1050180243.1280.26.camel@blafasel> <1050186320.4224.51.camel@nosferatu.lan> <1050188138.4931.51.camel@blafasel> <1050190221.4224.67.camel@nosferatu.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NgG3zgD49vMnq9neJiqX" Organization: Message-Id: <1050248779.1280.54.camel@blafasel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3- Date: 13 Apr 2003 17:46:19 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. X-Archives-Salt: 31b6cc91-4a66-4732-9bf9-83d0873450d6 X-Archives-Hash: 5128a3c3e48f0e41765574ca8e0dc0f3 --=-NgG3zgD49vMnq9neJiqX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I applied it and had no problems so far with it. But I changed a lot of other things as well (disabled lots of non-critical apache-modules, tried to tweak the php.ini etc.), so I'm not sure if the patch solved my problem or if it's solved at. On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 01:30, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:55, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > > Attached. > >=20 > > On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:25, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:44, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > > > > jay:~/apache-1.3.27/debian/patches# ls > > > > ab_overzealous_connections mime_type_fix > > > > apxs_assumes_dso mod_bandwidth_paths > > > > apxs_wrong_prefix phf_dot_log > > > > custom_response_segfaults =20 > > > > regex_must_conform_to_posix_for_LFS_to_work > > > > dbm_part_2_the_revenge server_subversioning > > > > debian_config_layout suexec_combined > > > > debian_ps_is_brutal suexec_of_death > > > > debian_requires_fPIC thetarget_unquoted > > > > hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream usr_bin_perl_owns_you > > > >=20 > > > > Uhm.. That's not really helpful for me... Any other ideas? > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Could you attach patches: > > >=20 > > > ab_overzealous_connections > > > mod_bandwidth_paths > > > suexec_combined > > > suexec_of_death > > > usr_bin_perl_owns_you > > >=20 > > > Although I do not think the last are related. =20 >=20 > Mind applying the ab_overzealous_connections patch, and > see if that makes a difference ? If you have issues > to get it applied, let me know (although I am going to > bed now =3D) >=20 >=20 > Regards, --=-NgG3zgD49vMnq9neJiqX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+mYZLeGGfskjv0zURArViAJ9pn6zm3GqJiByJUq2TMdG/QKrdogCdEMYp pNXrjRr6H0CHhobQzUbNbhc= =cCx+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NgG3zgD49vMnq9neJiqX--