Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again..

[Benjamin Podszun <ben@galactic-tales.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1656 bytes --]

I applied it and had no problems so far with it. But I changed a lot of
other things as well (disabled lots of non-critical apache-modules,
tried to tweak the php.ini etc.), so I'm not sure if the patch solved my
problem or if it's solved at.

On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 01:30, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:55, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> > Attached.
> > 
> > On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:25, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:44, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> > > > jay:~/apache-1.3.27/debian/patches# ls
> > > > ab_overzealous_connections     mime_type_fix
> > > > apxs_assumes_dso               mod_bandwidth_paths
> > > > apxs_wrong_prefix              phf_dot_log
> > > > custom_response_segfaults     
> > > > regex_must_conform_to_posix_for_LFS_to_work
> > > > dbm_part_2_the_revenge         server_subversioning
> > > > debian_config_layout           suexec_combined
> > > > debian_ps_is_brutal            suexec_of_death
> > > > debian_requires_fPIC           thetarget_unquoted
> > > > hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream  usr_bin_perl_owns_you
> > > > 
> > > > Uhm.. That's not really helpful for me... Any other ideas?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Could you attach patches:
> > > 
> > >   ab_overzealous_connections
> > >   mod_bandwidth_paths
> > >   suexec_combined
> > >   suexec_of_death
> > >   usr_bin_perl_owns_you
> > > 
> > > Although I do not think the last are related.  
> 
> Mind applying the ab_overzealous_connections patch, and
> see if that makes a difference ?  If you have issues
> to get it applied, let me know (although I am going to
> bed now =)
> 
> 
> Regards,

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]