From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12105 invoked by uid 1002); 12 Apr 2003 22:52:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12823 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2003 22:52:26 -0000 From: Benjamin Podszun To: Hasse Hagen Johansen Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1050187146.3931.12.camel@nexus6.musikcheck.dk> References: <1050174571.1279.17.camel@blafasel> <200304121524.19816.brian@mdrx.com> <1050179520.1274.24.camel@blafasel> <20030412204540.GA5108@cherenkov.orbis-terrarum.net> <1050184000.1273.32.camel@blafasel> <1050185822.32740.2.camel@localhost> <1050186906.1280.40.camel@blafasel> <1050187146.3931.12.camel@nexus6.musikcheck.dk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fk4CM9t+5lMSVli7P99N" Organization: Message-Id: <1050187873.1283.45.camel@blafasel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3- Date: 13 Apr 2003 00:51:13 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. X-Archives-Salt: 428a0d91-09c4-4183-87c8-a2a2dd6c368f X-Archives-Hash: 360681935275e710de1d26c1bfb3fe38 --=-fk4CM9t+5lMSVli7P99N Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gentoo * dev-php/mod_php Latest version available: 4.3.1 Latest version installed: 4.3.1 Debian php4: Installed: 4:4.2.3-9 On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:39, Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: > Maybe I haven't seen all you messages, but what are your php4 version on > gentoo vs. debian? >=20 > Hasse >=20 >=20 > On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:35, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 00:17, Brad Laue wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 17:46, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > > >=20 > > > > You upgraded to Apache2? I guess (hope?) that you don't talk about > > > > production environments? I tried to use Apache2 with PHP twice and > > > > wouldn't recommend it to anyone.. It's just buggy and not usable. A= s my > > > > current Gentoo-Servers are.. *cough* > > >=20 > > > Hardware configuration? Amount of RAM? Number of CPU's? What specific > > > revision of gentoo-sources? Have you tried vanilla-sources or alan co= x's > > > patchset? What configuration options had you given the Debian kernel = and > > > do they differ from those you gave to Gentoo's kernel? > >=20 > > Uhm.. I did post my hardware, but maybe it wasn't clear enough in all m= y > > messages. > > Compaq-Server, 2 1GHz CPUs, 2GB RAM, no special hardware, apart from > > Smart Arrays.. > > Vanilla-sources 2.4.20 > >=20 > > Debian: > > vanilla 2.4.18, built with the "normal" way, no deb-package > >=20 > > > Have you tried 2.4.18 under Gentoo to see if it solves your problems? > >=20 > > Yes, no difference > >=20 > > > This isn't a matter of Debian working and Gentoo not working; there's= a > > > configuration difference between the two, that's all. > >=20 > > Yes, I don't doubt it. But I copied the php.ini, apache-config-files an= d > > I don't see the difference. The only thing I see is that apache sucks u= p > > to 99% CPU (I don't know if it was the same on the Debian system, > > honestly) and the server stops responding to any requests while the loa= d > > drops to ~ 0 .. > >=20 > > Ben --=-fk4CM9t+5lMSVli7P99N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+mJhheGGfskjv0zURAsUiAJ9bZiM680M2nqrIRHOZg59AcGORkACg2na7 2nzD/ykLJe9ZLsNBLDdgIGA= =mLJm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fk4CM9t+5lMSVli7P99N--