public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Podszun <ben@galactic-tales.de>
To: Hasse Hagen Johansen <hhj@musikcheck.dk>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again..
Date: 12 Apr 2003 22:44:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050180243.1280.26.camel@blafasel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050179881.3930.9.camel@nexus6.musikcheck.dk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2801 bytes --]

jay:~/apache-1.3.27/debian/patches# ls
ab_overzealous_connections     mime_type_fix
apxs_assumes_dso               mod_bandwidth_paths
apxs_wrong_prefix              phf_dot_log
custom_response_segfaults     
regex_must_conform_to_posix_for_LFS_to_work
dbm_part_2_the_revenge         server_subversioning
debian_config_layout           suexec_combined
debian_ps_is_brutal            suexec_of_death
debian_requires_fPIC           thetarget_unquoted
hurd_compile_fix_for_upstream  usr_bin_perl_owns_you

Uhm.. That's not really helpful for me... Any other ideas?

On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:38, Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote:
> Have you checked if debian is using any special patches for that apache
> version? (you can see that if you get the source package, and look in
> the patches directory)
> 
> Hasse
> 
> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:32, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> > What kind of Infos?
> > 
> > The Apache-Version is the same, so is the configuration.
> > The only thing that I noticed is that one apache instance sucks up to
> > 99% CPU... It never uses less than 30% ..
> > And since this is a Compaq Server with Dual P3 1GHz and 2GB RAM I doubt
> > that this is right (tm).
> > 
> > Any new insights?
> > 
> > On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:24, Brian Jackson wrote:
> > > I think I've got to agree with Jon on this one, without more info, it looks 
> > > like an Apache/Apache config issue.
> > > 
> > > --Brian
> > > 
> > > On Saturday 12 April 2003 02:09 pm, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> > > > Hi there.
> > > > I switched to Gentoo on two of my servers recently. Before that I used
> > > > Debian stable with a 2.4.18-Kernel.
> > > > Right now the machines are nearly useless. They should serve lots of
> > > > pages, but every ~24h everything freezes without any load on the
> > > > machines.. The load drops to 0.01 and nothing is delivered.
> > > > Only a restart of apache resets this timeframe again.
> > > > Well, after searching for a solution for about 3-4 days I'm already in
> > > > the mood to wipe Gentoo, install Debian again and stay with Gentoo for
> > > > Desktop only..
> > > > If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to give them a try, but I
> > > > cannot afford to have two systems down on a regular basis for more than
> > > > 2-3 days..
> > > >
> > > > I installed 1.4, used the 2.4.20 vanilla-kernel and I installed nothing
> > > > special but exim and apache/php.
> > > > All of them use the most current ebuilds in the x86 portage-tree.
> > > > I wonder if this is related to the problems someone pointed out with the
> > > > select() performance? But it would be a vanilla-problem then?
> > > >
> > > > TIA for any suggestions,
> > > > Ben
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > > 

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-12 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-12 19:09 [gentoo-dev] Performance once again Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-12 19:13 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-04-12 19:44   ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-12 19:54     ` Jon Portnoy
2003-04-12 20:24 ` Brian Jackson
2003-04-12 20:32   ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-12 20:38     ` Hasse Hagen Johansen
2003-04-12 20:44       ` Benjamin Podszun [this message]
2003-04-12 22:25         ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-04-12 22:55           ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-12 23:30             ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-04-13 15:46               ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-13 18:11                 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-04-13 21:20                   ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-12 20:45     ` Robin H.Johnson
2003-04-12 21:46       ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-12 22:05         ` leahcim
2003-04-12 22:09         ` Robin H.Johnson
2003-04-12 22:17         ` Brad Laue
2003-04-12 22:35           ` Benjamin Podszun
     [not found]             ` <1050187146.3931.12.camel@nexus6.musikcheck.dk>
2003-04-12 22:51               ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-13  0:22             ` Brad Laue
2003-04-12 22:32         ` Terje Kvernes
2003-04-14  8:51 ` Václav Hůla
2003-04-14  9:03   ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-04-14  9:33     ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-04-14 12:30       ` Dar-Klajid

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1050180243.1280.26.camel@blafasel \
    --to=ben@galactic-tales.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=hhj@musikcheck.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox