Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again..

[Benjamin Podszun <ben@galactic-tales.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1743 bytes --]

What kind of Infos?

The Apache-Version is the same, so is the configuration.
The only thing that I noticed is that one apache instance sucks up to
99% CPU... It never uses less than 30% ..
And since this is a Compaq Server with Dual P3 1GHz and 2GB RAM I doubt
that this is right (tm).

Any new insights?

On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:24, Brian Jackson wrote:
> I think I've got to agree with Jon on this one, without more info, it looks 
> like an Apache/Apache config issue.
> 
> --Brian
> 
> On Saturday 12 April 2003 02:09 pm, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> > Hi there.
> > I switched to Gentoo on two of my servers recently. Before that I used
> > Debian stable with a 2.4.18-Kernel.
> > Right now the machines are nearly useless. They should serve lots of
> > pages, but every ~24h everything freezes without any load on the
> > machines.. The load drops to 0.01 and nothing is delivered.
> > Only a restart of apache resets this timeframe again.
> > Well, after searching for a solution for about 3-4 days I'm already in
> > the mood to wipe Gentoo, install Debian again and stay with Gentoo for
> > Desktop only..
> > If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to give them a try, but I
> > cannot afford to have two systems down on a regular basis for more than
> > 2-3 days..
> >
> > I installed 1.4, used the 2.4.20 vanilla-kernel and I installed nothing
> > special but exim and apache/php.
> > All of them use the most current ebuilds in the x86 portage-tree.
> > I wonder if this is related to the problems someone pointed out with the
> > select() performance? But it would be a vanilla-problem then?
> >
> > TIA for any suggestions,
> > Ben
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]