From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-1766-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 29589 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Mar 2003 18:07:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 18146 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2003 18:07:10 -0000
From: Frederick Reeve <frederick@woodland-i.org>
To: Alain Penders <alain@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20030309070831.GB23088@purematrix.com>
References: <1047156369.6631.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20030309070831.GB23088@purematrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1047204127.6574.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2- 
Date: 09 Mar 2003 11:02:07 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net.eth0
X-Archives-Salt: 4f0b6930-0095-4dca-8721-abd018d2cbc9
X-Archives-Hash: 32b62ab1ac5039a88d222685a8973541

> With force option, you mean an option that installs the package, even if
> it is masked?
> 
> We're looking at ways to eliminate package.mask for portage 2.1, but it'd be 
> done without using 'force'.

This is exactly what I meant.

Good well I guess you are a few steps ahead of me.

Frederick <sabin>




--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list