From: Eric Andresen <ndiin1@cox.net>
To: MAL <mal@komcept.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing
Date: 20 Feb 2003 11:04:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045764262.27123.1.camel@ndiin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E54ABDA.4070805@komcept.com>
I was refering to lines 22 through 31 of gcc-config-1.3.1.ebuild (and
similar for other gcc-config ebuilds). My guess is the changing of the
way that portage handled things made this method no longer work.
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 03:20, MAL wrote:
> Eric Andresen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 19:56, Terje Kvernes wrote:
> > I'm willing to bet that the problem is caused by that particular
> > ebuild's changing of the PATH. Just a thought. ;)
>
> I don't see how.. I have a few (>3) 1.4 systems that went through the
> upgrade fine, and looking at them, I can't see any difference in the
> PATH settings, between them and my updated-1.2 system.
>
> MAL
--
--Eric Andresen
ndiin@asu.edu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-16 15:46 [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r1 testing Nick Jones
2003-02-16 18:21 ` Rainer Groesslinger
2003-02-17 12:25 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 Out For Testing Nick Jones
2003-02-17 18:00 ` Pat Double
2003-02-17 18:28 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2003-02-18 15:42 ` Yannick Koehler
2003-02-18 16:44 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2003-02-18 20:52 ` Jeff Ames
2003-02-19 9:01 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-02-17 19:35 ` Brandon Low
2003-02-18 9:58 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-02-17 18:10 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r1 testing Alexander Futasz
2003-02-18 0:33 ` Matt Tucker
2003-02-19 10:42 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing MAL
2003-02-19 10:46 ` Benjamin Podszun
2003-02-19 10:57 ` MAL
2003-02-19 19:24 ` [gentoo-dev] telnet package in system Gustavo Felisberto
2003-02-20 2:56 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing Terje Kvernes
2003-02-20 3:59 ` Eric Andresen
2003-02-20 10:20 ` MAL
2003-02-20 18:04 ` Eric Andresen [this message]
2003-02-21 8:37 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 'gcc-config' issues Nick Jones
2003-02-21 9:10 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-02-21 10:32 ` MAL
2003-02-21 22:10 ` Nick Jones
2003-02-20 10:17 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing MAL
2003-02-20 10:32 ` MAL
2003-02-20 12:40 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-02-20 12:41 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-02-20 7:41 ` [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r1 testing Martin Larsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-20 16:23 [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing Martin, Stephen
2003-02-20 16:35 ` MAL
2003-02-20 16:48 Martin, Stephen
2003-02-20 17:06 Martin, Stephen
2003-02-20 19:30 ` Paul de Vrieze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1045764262.27123.1.camel@ndiin \
--to=ndiin1@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=mal@komcept.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox