[gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Mike Hogye]

Hi,

I am having trouble with Eclipse (2.0 and 2.0.2) and GTK+-2.2.0. I have
eclipse-platform-bin and eclipse-jdt-bin installed. (Other pertinent
packages: gnome-2.0.3-r1, sun-jdk-1.4.1.01.) Eclipse consistently hangs
when it has to draw a full progress bar (e.g. when you close Eclipse and
it indicates that it's saving your settings). I do not have this problem
with GTK+-2.0.9.

It doesn't print any error messages to stdout, stderr, or any core-dump-
type file, and there's no verbose command-line option. Any ideas about
where I can look for helpful debug info?

Thanks,
Mike Hogye


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Christian cycloon Gut]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 322 bytes --]

On 09 Jan 2003 12:42:35 -0500
Mike Hogye <hogye@metsci.com> wrote:

> Eclipse consistently hangs
> when it has to draw a full progress bar (e.g. when you close Eclipse
> and it indicates that it's saving your settings). I do not have this
> problem with GTK+-2.0.9.

Same Problem Here, perhaps reemerging java could help?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

RE: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Riyad Kalla]

I'm just gonna ask, cause I don't understand this.

When people refer to the emerging of Java, are you talking about
downloading the source separately via a SCSL agreement, and then running
emerge which compiles it, OR does emerge actually download the sun's
binary distribution of it, helping me to avoid treking over to
java.sun.com to download it myself?

The binary-only nature of the JDK is what confuses me when used in an
"emerge" context.

Thanks for any clarification!

Best,
-Riyad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian cycloon Gut [mailto:cycloon@is-root.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:05 PM
> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse
> 
> 
> On 09 Jan 2003 12:42:35 -0500
> Mike Hogye <hogye@metsci.com> wrote:
> 
> > Eclipse consistently hangs
> > when it has to draw a full progress bar (e.g. when you 
> close Eclipse 
> > and it indicates that it's saving your settings). I do not 
> have this 
> > problem with GTK+-2.0.9.
> 
> Same Problem Here, perhaps reemerging java could help?
> 


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Jan Winhuysen]

Hi!
Is there a possibility to install both gtk+ 2.2.0 and gtk+2.0.9 at the same 
time (i think portage will de-install the older version after an emerge) and 
tell eclipse to use the older libary???
Regards 
  Jan

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Matthew Kennedy]

Jan Winhuysen <Jan.Winhuysen@TU-Clausthal.de> writes:

> Hi!
> Is there a possibility to install both gtk+ 2.2.0 and gtk+2.0.9 at the same 
> time (i think portage will de-install the older version after an emerge) and 
> tell eclipse to use the older libary???
> Regards 

In retrospect, they should have been masked.

-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[foser]

Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> In retrospect, they should have been masked.
> 

Eclipse you mean, i hope ?

- foser


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Matthew Kennedy]

foser <foser@foser.dyn.warande.net> writes:

> Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> > In retrospect, they should have been masked.
> > 
> 
> Eclipse you mean, i hope ?

Slotted, i mean.

-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[foser]

Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> foser <foser@foser.dyn.warande.net> writes:
> 
> 
>>Matthew Kennedy wrote:
>>
>>>In retrospect, they should have been masked.
>>>
>>
>>Eclipse you mean, i hope ?
> 
> 
> Slotted, i mean.
> 

Still Eclipse you mean, i presume ?

- foser


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Mike Hogye]

> >>>In retrospect, they should have been masked.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Eclipse you mean, i hope ?
> > 
> > 
> > Slotted, i mean.
> > 
> 
> Still Eclipse you mean, i presume ?

He probably means gtk+. That would allow 2.0.9 and 2.2.0 to coexist
peacefully -- eclipse could use 2.0.9, and everything else could use
2.2.0.

2.2.0 is supposed to have maintained binary compatibility with 2.0. I'm
not sure how slotting decisions are made, but to me this looks more like
a bug that needs to be fixed. But where's the bug? In Sun's jre? In
gtk+?

Is there a way to get verbose logging from the gtk+ libraries (without
fooling with the source)? Sun's jdk/jre is binaries. Maybe we could try
this with a different jre and see if we still have the same problem.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[foser]

Mike Hogye wrote:
> He probably means gtk+. That would allow 2.0.9 and 2.2.0 to coexist
> peacefully -- eclipse could use 2.0.9, and everything else could use
> 2.2.0.

gtk+-2.0.9 and 2.2.0 cannot coexist like 1.2 and 2 can.

> 2.2.0 is supposed to have maintained binary compatibility with 2.0. I'm
> not sure how slotting decisions are made, but to me this looks more like
> a bug that needs to be fixed. But where's the bug? In Sun's jre? In
> gtk+?

Most likely in eclipse, the progressbar thats talked about is not basic gtk.

- foser


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Jan Winhuysen]

Hi!

> Most likely in eclipse, the progressbar thats talked about is not basic
> gtk.

A friend of mine got the same problem on his Debian Box. He tried the new 
Eclipse Milestone (M4 I think) and it works together wit gtk+2.2. So the 
error has to be in Eclipse or the JRE...
-Jan


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-dev] gtk+-2.2.0 & eclipse

[Troy Dack]

On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 09:04, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> I'm just gonna ask, cause I don't understand this.
> 
> When people refer to the emerging of Java, are you talking about
> downloading the source separately via a SCSL agreement, and then running
> emerge which compiles it, OR does emerge actually download the sun's
> binary distribution of it, helping me to avoid treking over to
> java.sun.com to download it myself?
> 
> The binary-only nature of the JDK is what confuses me when used in an
> "emerge" context.
> 
> Thanks for any clarification!

In this case you can do either.  There are ebuilds that fetch the binary
.tar.gz's and imstall them.

There are also ebuilds that instruct you to go to sun, read the
agreement, download the sources, place them in /usr/portage/distfiles
and then re-run the ebuild to actually compile java from source.

The second method does still require a binary java installed to perform
the actual biuld of java from source though.  Once you have your own
java built you can safely unmerge the other binary java package(s).

-- 
	Troy Dack


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list