From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20603 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Jan 2003 15:32:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 1907 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 15:32:42 -0000 From: Stefan Jones To: gentoo-dev In-Reply-To: <200301051617.03191.blauwers@gentoo.org> References: <200301022027.08364.zhen@gentoo.org> <200301051530.23640.werner.van.belle@vub.ac.be> <1041777696.1422.32.camel@localhost> <200301051617.03191.blauwers@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1041780593.1422.39.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1- Date: 05 Jan 2003 15:29:53 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcing new Prelinking Guide X-Archives-Salt: 8f9fcdad-91d9-47f3-8578-e2f28f03a8e2 X-Archives-Hash: 6a198303a464cabf34885df0758034e4 On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 15:17, Bart Lauwers wrote: > I've been wondering about the impact on portage however. Will portage know to > unmerge these prelinked binaries still? My guess would be no. > Well the answer is yes, the portage changes are already in and working, test it if you want. Portage integration is seamless . > General remark: Prelinking definitely promises to be great but unless your > willing to deal with some 'early adoption' quirks it isn't for you yet. I've > broken my system once or twice severely trying to gauge it's state. I would > say that some challenges remain before it is ready for the masses. > The problem is that I have never had a single problem with it on three computers (one of which being a sparc ). I can only fix errors I can replicate. -- Stefan Jones Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list