From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16213 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Dec 2002 21:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 6442 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 21:14:27 -0000 From: Martin Schlemmer To: Maik Schreiber Cc: Gentoo-Dev , gentoo-core In-Reply-To: <20021216210420.GA11372@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> References: <3DFE1BD9.5090004@foser.warande.net> <20021216203412.GB8276@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> <1040071802.15389.9.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20021216210420.GA11372@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1040072708.15389.13.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0- Date: 16 Dec 2002 23:05:08 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? X-Archives-Salt: 38768a69-38e5-49d6-8aa8-95f3ea91355f X-Archives-Hash: 389bec4fb4b8f5452a7470a15e2af64b On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 23:04, Maik Schreiber wrote: > Sorry if this was causing confusion with you, but Mozilla was just an example. The discussion was about marking an otherwise stable package > as "unstable" because some of its dependencies were marked "unstable". NP =) -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list