From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from vianetworks.co.uk (staff.mail.u-net.net [194.119.128.79]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE49AAC438 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:04:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [195.102.252.176] (helo=julia.random-chaos.org.uk) by vianetworks.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.04) id 184JFN-0006l0-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:00:21 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GnomeUI-WARNING From: Colin Morey To: William Kenworthy Cc: gentoo-dev List In-Reply-To: <1034998541.8843.24.camel@rattus.localdomain> References: <1034970614.12974.5.camel@newkid.fam59.net> <1034984740.8784.15.camel@rattus.localdomain> <1034985810.7477.3.camel@waterhouse.internal.lan> <1034998541.8843.24.camel@rattus.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 23 Oct 2002 12:05:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1035371144.26777.33.camel@julia.random-chaos.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanner: This e-mail has been scanned by VIA NET.WORKS UK Managed Anti-Virus service powered by Sophos. Message ID: *184JFN-0006l0-00*FXiUsV90bV.* Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 715477d5-6c1f-4159-82b1-cdf556e28132 X-Archives-Hash: 3adeec800ee0c6d988775a02d95dec3e On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 04:35, William Kenworthy wrote: > I dont see ssh as being a good solution in this case. On a firewalled > single user machine, the complexity of going through ssh (which seems to > have a patchy history as regards security itself) seems like it might be > more of a risk (i.e., misconfiguration, security holes etc) as well as > the inconvenience of an unwieldy command line compared to the > alternative - simplicity. > personally i find that "su" works, (without the - switch), so sudo su gives me a root shell, which i can normally run X stuff from. Cheers, Colin Morey