From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-04.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.36]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 591CBABB0D for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 00:30:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 22988 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2002 05:30:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rattus.Localdomain) (203.59.201.230) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 20 Oct 2002 05:30:37 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rattus.Localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A82F13176D; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 13:30:37 +0800 (WST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] Sun-jdk 1.4.1_01 From: William Kenworthy To: karltk@gentoo.org Cc: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , m3thos@netcabo.pt, gentoo-user List , gentoo-dev List In-Reply-To: <20021020014255.08a32fd3.karltk@prosalg.no> References: <00ff01c276c9$f5f05e70$8204dca7@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> <3DB17549.3000807@netcabo.pt> <001601c27782$07de05c0$0101a8c0@cascade> <20021020014255.08a32fd3.karltk@prosalg.no> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 20 Oct 2002 13:30:37 +0800 Message-Id: <1035091837.8843.41.camel@rattus.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 49862d45-0ab5-4ce3-b8cc-eba4ff32dd5b X-Archives-Hash: 9ab32d686beb6ec0b9c5fca4be12f56b Are any jre/jdk's being built with gcc 3.2 yet? Particularly the moz plugin. BillK On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 07:42, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: > On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:13:07 -0500 > "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote: > > > I agree. Since Gentoo does not fix bugs in the JDK, there is very > > little reason not to include it. > > The ticket #8291 "Ebuild for sun-jdk-1.4.1" has been assigned to mkennedy; > he'll most likely solve this when more critical issues have been attended > to. > > The reason why the sun-jdk-1.4.1 hasn't been included is simply because > nobody has gotten around to it yet. > > It should however be some consolation to the Java geeks around that the > blackdown-jdk-1.4.1_beta is available for testing on the x86 platform. Go > play with it and report back bugs and help the Blackdown team as much as > you can. > > We default to Blackdown whenever possible, as it can be downloaded freely > off the net, and mirrored too, unlike the Sun binaries. > > > Kind regards, > > Karl T > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-user mailing list > gentoo-user@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-user >