* [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)
@ 2002-10-13 13:11 Rolf Offermanns
2002-10-13 14:48 ` Rigo Ketelings
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rolf Offermanns @ 2002-10-13 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]
Can anyone help me with the following?
When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
* sys-devel/flex
Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
so why isn't it listed in the search?
Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
following:
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
Calculating dependencies |
emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
-Rolf
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)
2002-10-13 13:11 [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Rolf Offermanns
@ 2002-10-13 14:48 ` Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-13 14:53 ` [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS ! Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-18 2:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Nicholas Wourms
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rigo Ketelings @ 2002-10-13 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Rolf Offermanns, gentoo-dev
In short: new functionality..
Put :
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
in your make.conf & you'll be fine..
Regards,
Rigo
On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Can anyone help me with the following?
>
> When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> * sys-devel/flex
> Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
> Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
> Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
> Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
>
> There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> so why isn't it listed in the search?
>
> Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
>
> When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> following:
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating dependencies |
>
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
>
> I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
>
> -Rolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS !
2002-10-13 13:11 [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Rolf Offermanns
2002-10-13 14:48 ` Rigo Ketelings
@ 2002-10-13 14:53 ` Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-13 22:02 ` Evan Read
2002-10-18 2:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Nicholas Wourms
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rigo Ketelings @ 2002-10-13 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
<Quote who=bcowman@gentoo.org>
I did a work around for the sandboxing on ethereal 0.9.7, its now masked for
testing using new arch testing keywords. I'm gonna close this out could u
please resubmit me the correct kismet ebuild :). BTW here are the
instructions for unmasking arch testing keywords:
Another important snippet. If you want to unmask all ~x86 KEYWORDSed
ebuilds, add the following to your /etc/make.conf:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is incremental like USE so it *will* keep the existing
"x86" that is defined in your profile. This can also be done using the
environment for temporary testing purposes:
# export ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" (or "~ppc" or "~sparc", etc.)
</Quote>
Rigo
On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Can anyone help me with the following?
>
> When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> * sys-devel/flex
> Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
> Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
> Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
> Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
>
> There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> so why isn't it listed in the search?
>
> Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
>
> When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> following:
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating dependencies |
>
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
>
> I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
>
> -Rolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS !
2002-10-13 14:53 ` [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS ! Rigo Ketelings
@ 2002-10-13 22:02 ` Evan Read
2002-10-13 22:17 ` Martin Schlemmer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Evan Read @ 2002-10-13 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Rigo Ketelings; +Cc: gentoo-dev
Can you explain this functionality?
What does the "~" mean in this instance?
THanks
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 00:53, Rigo Ketelings wrote:
> <Quote who=bcowman@gentoo.org>
>
> I did a work around for the sandboxing on ethereal 0.9.7, its now masked for
> testing using new arch testing keywords. I'm gonna close this out could u
> please resubmit me the correct kismet ebuild :). BTW here are the
> instructions for unmasking arch testing keywords:
>
> Another important snippet. If you want to unmask all ~x86 KEYWORDSed
> ebuilds, add the following to your /etc/make.conf:
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is incremental like USE so it *will* keep the existing
> "x86" that is defined in your profile. This can also be done using the
> environment for temporary testing purposes:
>
> # export ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" (or "~ppc" or "~sparc", etc.)
>
>
> </Quote>
>
> Rigo
>
>
> On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> > Can anyone help me with the following?
> >
> > When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> > * sys-devel/flex
> > Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
> > Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
> > Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
> > Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
> >
> > There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> > so why isn't it listed in the search?
> >
> > Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> > unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
> >
> > When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> > following:
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
> >
> > Calculating dependencies |
> >
> > emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> > ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
> >
> > I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
> >
> > -Rolf
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>
--
For security use OpenBSD: http://eread.freeshell.org/
"The future comes 60 minutes an hour no matter who you are or what you
do."
The Screwtape Letters - C.S. Lewis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)
2002-10-13 13:11 [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Rolf Offermanns
2002-10-13 14:48 ` Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-13 14:53 ` [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS ! Rigo Ketelings
@ 2002-10-18 2:31 ` Nicholas Wourms
2002-10-20 4:31 ` Martin Schlemmer
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Wourms @ 2002-10-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Can anyone help me with the following?
>
> When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> * sys-devel/flex
> Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
> Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
> Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
> Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
>
> There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> so why isn't it listed in the search?
>
> Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
>
> When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> following:
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating dependencies |
>
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
>
> I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
>
Possibly a different subject, but are people aware that flex is now up to
2.5.22? Many fix0rs and such have been incorporated into the new version.
Hit me up for the new maintainer's webpage.
Cheers,
Nicholas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)
2002-10-18 2:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Nicholas Wourms
@ 2002-10-20 4:31 ` Martin Schlemmer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schlemmer @ 2002-10-20 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: nwourms; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 491 bytes --]
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 04:31, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Possibly a different subject, but are people aware that flex is now up to
> 2.5.22? Many fix0rs and such have been incorporated into the new version.
> Hit me up for the new maintainer's webpage.
>
Hmm, then not many people know it, as Redhat/MDK is also still on 2.5.4.
Anyhow, new URL will be appreciated.
--
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-20 4:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-13 13:11 [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Rolf Offermanns
2002-10-13 14:48 ` Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-13 14:53 ` [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS ! Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-13 22:02 ` Evan Read
2002-10-13 22:17 ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-10-18 2:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1) Nicholas Wourms
2002-10-20 4:31 ` Martin Schlemmer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox