From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <billk@iinet.net.au>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-02.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.34])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 76842ABB74
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:36:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 14204 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 23:36:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rattus.Localdomain) (203.59.110.40)
  by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 23:36:07 -0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by rattus.Localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4669D143C1D; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:36:06 +0800 (WST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)]
From: William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
To: Steven Stillaway <steve@stillaway.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev List <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020919193023.GA8468@sparcbox.net>
References: <1032454989.26838.81.camel@inventor.gentoo.org> 
	<20020919193023.GA8468@sparcbox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 20 Sep 2002 07:36:06 +0800
Message-Id: <1032478566.325.1.camel@rattus.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 49098abf-8f8d-42cb-afb6-70d7370db43d
X-Archives-Hash: 5e4d88e202fe4883661d462b49e3c346

I agree, this could be very counter productive.  By all means have some
private commincation channels for core developers, but this looks too
much closed source/microsoftish

BillK

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 03:30, Steven Stillaway wrote:
> >     * GDN would only be accessible to registered Developers (with
> >       perhaps different access levels) 
> 
> 
> Putting ACL's on the developer content is completely counter
> productive in an open source project IMHO.
> 
> Why are you trying to make it more difficult for people who are 
> interested in hacking gentoo (and hopefully contributing back) to
> do so.