From: Evan Read <eread@freeshell.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)]
Date: 20 Sep 2002 08:06:37 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032473213.2251.4.camel@modulo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1032454989.26838.81.camel@inventor.gentoo.org>
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 03:03, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> -----Forwarded Message-----
>
> From: antonio.meireles@epandemic.com
> Subject: [gentoo-core] gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)
> Date: 17 Sep 2002 17:33:09 +0100
>
> for public review / comments / whatever
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> version 0.0.1 (14/September/2002 [18h00 GMT-0] )
Hey,
Some of these things are admirable goals, but I think that the first
thing Gentoo really needs to do is get to the point where people are
willing to use it in production with assurances of timely security fixes
etc. Then it will begin to appeal to an even broader market (no one
said it couldn't still be up to date) and then perhaps some of these
things will become more necessary.
I notice that the Debian project has none of this kind of separate of
content. And they have a huge community. RedHat does because they have
a huge amount of content and also because they are talking to a less
savvy crowd.
Gentoo has neither a mammoth user base, nor a huge amount of content
(what they have is great and the users are great, of course!). I don't
see this as a huge need write now. Let the hackers hack. The
documenters document. Let see where we are in a few months time.
Evan
--
For security use OpenBSD: http://eread.freeshell.org/
"The future comes 60 minutes an hour no matter who you are or what you
do."
The Screwtape Letters - C.S. Lewis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-19 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-19 17:03 [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)] Daniel Robbins
2002-09-19 18:32 ` Fred Van Andel
2002-09-19 19:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mark Gordon
2002-09-19 19:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven Stillaway
2002-09-19 20:07 ` Peter Ruskin
2002-09-19 23:36 ` William Kenworthy
2002-09-19 23:40 ` Matthew Walker
2002-09-19 22:06 ` Evan Read [this message]
2002-09-19 23:14 ` humpback
2002-09-20 8:42 ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-20 1:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mecho Puh
[not found] <106232945@toto.iv>
2002-09-19 22:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeffrey D. Kowing
[not found] <83821536@toto.iv>
2002-09-19 22:28 ` Jeffrey D. Kowing
2002-09-24 11:12 ` Thomas M. Beaudry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1032473213.2251.4.camel@modulo \
--to=eread@freeshell.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox