From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rigo@home.nl>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from mail4.home.nl (mail4.home.nl [213.51.129.228])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB82ABD88
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed,  7 Aug 2002 05:27:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([217.120.15.104]) by mail4.home.nl
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.29 201-229-121-129-20011121) with ESMTP
          id <20020807102913.QJIS18331.mail4.home.nl@[192.168.0.10]>
          for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:29:13 +0200
From: Rigo <rigo@home.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 07 Aug 2002 12:00:29 +0200
Message-Id: <1028714429.22693.8.camel@lappy.rogi.biz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [gentoo-dev] wrong glibc patch ?
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 172708aa-93e9-438f-85d7-ed6d152b6ab2
X-Archives-Hash: a51d2b5b714172646907be9411616e3e

I just read this on the forums...Anybody any comments ?

Regards, Rigo


<SNIP>
I
installed a cvs snap of gcc-3.1.1 (about to be released - yeah
right!)

Build of glibc-2.2.5 will bomb unless the following patch is
applied. I stole this from the stable glibc-2.2.6 branch of
cvs. And for the record, this is slightly different to the
patch the gentoo guys are using. Their's is wrong.

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-05/msg00024.html

for reference. 
</SNIP>