From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stubear@gentoo.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from mps4.plala.or.jp (mpsb-nat02.plala.or.jp [202.212.114.145])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680E1ABD71
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu,  1 Aug 2002 11:12:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from i170088.ap.plala.or.jp ([218.47.170.88]) by mps4.plala.or.jp
          with ESMTP
          id <20020801161155.QPVX22328.mps4.plala.or.jp@i170088.ap.plala.or.jp>
          for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 01:11:55 +0900
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSSL
From: Stuart Bouyer <stubear@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <3D480056.7020303@websoft.com>
References: <200207301709.46925.aliz@gentoo.org>
	<3D47F22F.8020007@websoft.com> <3D47FDF3.5080202@gmx.de> 
	<3D480056.7020303@websoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 02 Aug 2002 01:16:47 +0900
Message-Id: <1028218607.2541.2.camel@gentoo-bear>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 216e22be-0c11-44ba-bf0c-3ef93d157fc5
X-Archives-Hash: 018b60f20eca43cc44cc964213fdfb80

On =E6=9C=A8, 2002-08-01 at 00:20, Mickey Mullin wrote:
<snip>
> > Coz it doesn't :P ITs going to remove d not e. c and e are protected.=20
> > I'd better ask why it wants to NOT unmerge c :)
>=20
> Uh, yeah!  That's what I was thinking.  Why is it keeping "c"?  That's wh=
at=20
> I meant all along.  Uh huh.  Sure it is, Mick...
>=20
It's not emerging c cause c didn't have a SLOT in it, so portage doesn't
know it can throw it away. To get rid of c - do emerge -P openssl (do
emerge -Pp openssl first to make sure it wont get e by accident)

Stuart