From: Rigo <rigo@home.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage: good news and bad news
Date: 08 Jul 2002 07:13:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1026112391.7256.6.camel@lappy.rogi.biz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1026023935.29116.94.camel@inventor.gentoo.org>
After updating portage to 2.0.11 I seem to get more errors that before
Daniel ;-)...
Info:
lappy distfiles # emerge --update world
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge media-libs/jpeg-mmx-1.1.2-r1 to /
!!! No message digest found for .
!!! Type "ebuild foo.ebuild digest" to generate a digest.
!!! emerge aborting on
/usr/portage/media-libs/jpeg-mmx/jpeg-mmx-1.1.2-r1.ebuild .
lappy distfiles # ebuild
/usr/portage/media-libs/jpeg-mmx/jpeg-mmx-1.1.2-r1.ebuild digest
>>> Generating digest file...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/ebuild", line 33, in ?
a=portage.doebuild(pargs[0],x,getroot(),debug=debug)
File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 1130, in
doebuild
digestgen(checkme,overwrite=1)
File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 955, in
digestgen
mymd5=perform_md5(myfile)
File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 1368, in
perform_md5
return perform_checksum(x)[0]
File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/portage.py", line 39, in
perform_checksum
return fchksum.fmd5t(filename)
IOError: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/usr/portage/distfiles/'
Regards, Rigo
Op zo 07-07-2002, om 06:38 schreef Daniel Robbins:
> Hi Devs:
>
> Bad news: I found a significant bug in Portage 2.0.10 and earlier that
> could cause masking to work improperly, particularly if a package has
a
> ~ entry in the profile's packages file.
>
> Good news: I've fixed the problem in Portage 2.0.11 by rewriting
> portage.py's portdbapi xmatch() and visible() methods. This has
> resulted in a 44% speed-up in dependency calculations over Portage
> 2.0.10. If you thought things were fast before...
>
> More good news: I've improved repoman to differentiate between
> user-visible ebuilds with bad dependencies and masked ebuilds with bad
> dependencies. When checking dependencies, user-visible ebuilds'
> dependencies are only matched against user-visible ebuilds. But when
> masked ebuilds are checked, deps are satisfied using *all* available
> ebuilds. This should eliminate virtually all false positives in the
> repoman DEPEND and RDEPEND QA tests. Type "repoman --help" for more
> information on these new changes.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> --
> Daniel Robbins
> Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux
> http://www.gentoo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-08 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-07 6:38 [gentoo-dev] Portage: good news and bad news Daniel Robbins
2002-07-07 15:39 ` Terje Kvernes
2002-07-07 18:11 ` Chad M. Huneycutt
2002-07-07 20:32 ` Terje Kvernes
2002-07-07 18:59 ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-07-07 19:09 ` Marko Mikulicic
2002-07-08 7:13 ` Rigo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1026112391.7256.6.camel@lappy.rogi.biz \
--to=rigo@home.nl \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox