From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adam.voigt@cryptocomm.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from kermit.unets.com (unknown [64.238.252.21])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99E5ABD8C
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:54:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 64-238-252-49.kmcmail.net ([64.238.252.49]) by kermit.unets.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905);
	 Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:52:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mysterious Problem
From: Adam Voigt <adam.voigt@cryptocomm.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200206102303.16454.pierre.haboueit@m4x.org>
References: <200206102303.16454.pierre.haboueit@m4x.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5.99 
Date: 11 Jun 2002 11:52:50 -0400
Message-Id: <1023810770.1145.16.camel@beowulf.cryptocomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2002 15:52:50.0571 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A3715B0:01C21160]
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 02d128b9-5b50-4b20-9a73-8145988375cb
X-Archives-Hash: 1f60d6ee765d72e1a3fa3d68eca3c054

Umm, maybe this is just me, but why not just do:

alias_eth0=3D"129.104.221.100 netmask 255.255.255.0"

?

Adam Voigt
adam.voigt@cryptocomm.com

On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 20:31, MadCoder wrote:
> I want my eht0 card to accept two ip.
>=20
> so, I use this config :
>=20
> face_eth0=3D"129.104.221.165 broadcast 129.104.221.255 netmask 255.255.25=
5.0"
> iface_eth1=3D"192.168.1.1 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> alias_eth0=3D"129.104.221.100"
>=20
> but there is a big problem : the alias_eht0 has netmask 255.255.0.0 by de=
fault=20
> !!!
>=20
> how can I specify, that I want netmask=3D255.255.255.0 ?
> and why isn't it the default choice, since i'ts the netmask of face_eth0 =
?
> --=20
> Don't be afraid ... I'm going to give you the choice I've never had
>=20
> (=B0>
> / )  MadCoder (53 53)
> ^^
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev