From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_QUAR,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E38BDABD81 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:04:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 26786 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jun 2002 16:04:15 -0000 Received: from dl-adsl-c8d44ceb.sao.terra.com.br (HELO tara.pvt.jagunco.net) (200.212.76.235) by mail.gmx.net (mp010-rz3) with SMTP; 10 Jun 2002 16:04:15 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] logging in portage From: Rufiao Valhacouto To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200206092317.33179.georges@its.caltech.edu> References: <1023668825.8054.11.camel@tara.pvt.jagunco.net> <200206092317.33179.georges@its.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 10 Jun 2002 13:04:08 -0300 Message-Id: <1023725055.14555.94.camel@tara.pvt.jagunco.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: e6fd2d45-683f-42d0-a288-4da5a9fb960b X-Archives-Hash: 192ac31107a977923b75e83ac53c0a4a On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 03:17, George Shapovalov wrote: > Whats wrong with: > emerge pkgname &>/some/place/repfile.rep > ? > It should be easy to call it inside the script you use to emerge packages on > this server. If you desire to make reports on a per-package basis it should > be easy to create the script that would run emerge --pretend packagename > first and then call emerge for every reported package and capture reports > separately... I've written such a [sh] script, and it's not quite straightforward due to the text manipulations it needs to do in the emerge text output (maybe it could be better by writing it in python directly interfacing with portage.py). Anyway, it seems for me it'd be nice to have the build output of every single package in the system (in other words, be part of the framework), not only for the ones processed by the logging script. > WTF incorporating this into portage itself: I did not see this mentioned > (though there were some related things suggested). If you think this is an > important addition please file a feature request to bugs.gentoo.org. I'll post it to bugs.gentoo.org. Please contact me if you think I could help providing code for this.