From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <c.davies@cdavies.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING,
MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
version=4.0.0
Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47])
by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D11AC72D
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:11:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from m39-mp1-cvx1a.swa.ntl.com ([213.105.228.39])
by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
id <20020605221151.BDEX19225.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@m39-mp1-cvx1a.swa.ntl.com>
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 23:11:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adapting webmin and usermin
From: Chris Davies <c.davies@cdavies.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200206051531.07051.styx@SuxOS.org>
References: <20020605000522.3823624b.bass@gentoo.org>
<1023248295.3037.57.camel@vindaloo.flat146>
<20020605110251.47d15b11.bass@gentoo.org>
<200206051531.07051.styx@SuxOS.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2-
Date: 05 Jun 2002 23:11:49 +0100
Message-Id: <1023315111.4920.2.camel@vindaloo.flat146>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 34b4fdd9-abd0-4524-98b9-be90e2b428ec
X-Archives-Hash: 338c3ef36bac327d45848c14fde551d7
Hi,
I have no idea if an 'official' gentoo profile is in the pipeline, but
I'll be sure to send a patch when I complete my own, as it would be a
deal prettier to build if that stuff was included right in the tarball.
We'll see :)
Thanks,
C.Davies
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 14:31, Joachim Blaabjerg wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 June 2002 11:02, Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez wrote:
>
> > |3) What distribution should be chosen as a close approximation of
> > |Gentoo. I choose Redhat 7.2 as my first guess, and then later upgraded
> > |to .3 and I haven't noticed anything obviously broken, but extensive
> > |testing would be required before I'd let this anywhere near portage.
> > |Suggestions? Volunteers for testing? :)
> >
> > i thinks that debian, slackware, o inclusive freebsd are more exact that
> > redhat
>
> Well, I'm not too sure. I'm not an eager Webmin user (I guess I've tested it
> once or so), but wouldn't the BSD/SysV init scripts b0rk?
>
> Anyway, I heard some mumbling about Webmin and how the author was working on a
> Gentoo profile himself... Can someone confirm that?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Joachim Blaabjerg
> styx@SuxOS.org
> www.SuxOS.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
--
Chris Davies <c.davies@cdavies.org>
CS Student, Swansea, UK.
http://www.cdavies.org/
Public Key: http://www.cdavies.org/cdavies.gpg