From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from red.ces.clemson.edu (red-pc.ces.clemson.edu [130.127.222.102]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB55AC3D5 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:22:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: by red.ces.clemson.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA45470754; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:22:26 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive? From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <3CFCCBD1.6030607@seul.org> References: <3CFCAD43.1020300@seul.org> <20020604152159.3fb59962.jago@telefragged.com> < 3CFCB5C4.3060109@seul.org> <200206041508.22305.pauldv@cs.kun.nl> <3CFCC476.9 010308@seul.org> <20020604170033.36733971.jago@telefragged.com> <3CFCCBD1.6030607@seul.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 04 Jun 2002 10:22:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1023200546.12194.25.camel@red.ces.clemson.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 63288cdd-ead2-463f-86c8-2b1970f35351 X-Archives-Hash: 308b4a2da587f60eebdaa38b666664d4 > I was wondering if switching to CVS would only update the ebuilds or > also update (relax) the maskings. In other words, it is safe to > sync the portage tree with gentoo cvs ? Yep. The anoncvs and rsync servers return exactly the same files. -g2boojum-