[gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Roman Weber]

Hi all

I'm now building the commandline version of php.

Now:
How should I name the package?
php-cli
php-bin
php-cmd
php-shell
or other ideas?

Should I compile in the 'experimental' CLI support?
The CGI-security features?

What do you think?

Roman

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Damien]

Le ven 24/05/2002 à 14:11, Roman Weber a écrit :
> Hi all
> 
> I'm now building the commandline version of php.
> 
> Now:
> How should I name the package?
> php-cli
> php-bin
> php-cmd
> php-shell
> or other ideas?

php-cgi ?

Damien

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Gwenn Gueguen]

> How should I name the package?
> php-cli
> php-bin
> php-cmd
> php-shell
> or other ideas?

php-standalone ?

-- 
Gwenn

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Roman Weber]

Hi Damien

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 14:23, Damien wrote:
> 
> php-cgi ?

It tells something like 'You can use me as cgi' also it must have
all the security things compiled in....

On the other hand, you don't need the cgi-version because you have
the module.

I personally use the command line version for cron-jobs and other
tasks...

Roman

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[hanez]

> How should I name the package?
> php-cli
> php-bin
> php-cmd
> php-shell
> or other ideas?

i think php-cmd or php-shell are good. i prefer php-cmd. or could we call it a 
true shell?!?!? i didn't tested it but it sound interesting.

> Should I compile in the 'experimental' CLI support?
> The CGI-security features?

do we need these features on the commandline??? i don't think so.

> What do you think?

cool to ask the mailinglist about the name... ;-)

regards
hanez... ;-)

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Arcady Genkin]

Roman Weber <gentoo@gonzo.ch> writes:

> How should I name the package?

I think that the current PHP package should be renamed into ``mod_php'',
and command-line PHP should be named ``php''.
-- 
Arcady Genkin
Thanks God I'm still an atheist! -- Luis Bunuel

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[hanez]

On Friday 24 May 2002 17:16, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> I think that the current PHP package should be renamed into ``mod_php'',
> and command-line PHP should be named ``php''.

yeah, thats the right way...

regards
hanez... ;-)

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Bjarke Sørensen]

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:16:14AM -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> > How should I name the package?
> I think that the current PHP package should be renamed into ``mod_php'',
> and command-line PHP should be named ``php''.

I'll second that!

-- 
| Bjarke Sørensen  /  9000.WASD 
|
|  There are 10 types of people in this world:
|  Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP command-line version ebuild

[Roman Weber]

Hi Arcady

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 17:16, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> I think that the current PHP package should be renamed into ``mod_php'',
> and command-line PHP should be named ``php''.

Hmm...i think, this will confusing portage.....

But other idea:
- Open a new directory dev-php/
  (I have some extensions, i don't know where else i should add them)
- dev-lang/php to dev-php/mod_php
- commandline version to dev-php/php
- replace dev-lang/php with an error ebuild. Something like
  `emerge dev-lang/php` -> "Please merge dev-php/mod_php for ...." 
- And after some weeks, removing dev-lang/php from cvs....

What do you and all others mean? 

Roman