From: "Lars S. Jensen" <larssj@nospam.dk>
To: Gentoo dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mesa >=3.5 masked!?
Date: 21 May 2002 15:28:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1021987735.5875.72.camel@pegasus.lasj.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020520233212.Y8474@localhost>
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 00:32, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.05.20 22:14 Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 15:29, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see how the first comment can be true as Mesa is an
> > implementation
> > > of the OpenGL standard which, besides of source compatibility, also has
> >
> > > binary compatibility within a platform. Mesa releases notes also don't
> > > mention nothing like that.
> > >
> > > Regarding the second comment I found the referring bug number 245. It
> > says
> > > that NVIDIA can't use the SGI libGLU.la 1.3 included in Mesa >=3.5. If
> > so
> > > then why is the same SGI libGLU 1.3 available trhu the sgi-oss-glu
> > ebuild?
> > > Stranger is that the "Nvidia OpenGL Configuration mini-HOWTO"
> > > (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Nvidia-OpenGL-Configuration/) uses Mesa
> >
> > > 4.0.1 in the tutorial, but on the other hand the author does state that
> >
> > > "not had time to test all the procedures"...
> > >
> > > So it seems that there is quite a bit of misunderstanding. Is it mine
> > or
> > > should I fill in a bug report?
> > >
> >
> > Point is ... experience shows that those included with xfree
> > works 99% of the time, if not 100%. If you want to use
> > 4.0.1, go for it ... you just get to keep the pieces.
>
> This doesn't address the question. If so then why is Mesa in Gentoo at
> all!? Since Gentoo distributes Mesa then there is no reason to not have
> Mesa 4.0.
Because Mesa was needed for OpenGL support before XFree version 4.2.0-rX
>From ebuild 4.1.0
#We're no longer including libGLU from here. Packaged separately, from
separate sources.
OpenGL was an option at that time.
XFree use/is based on the Mesa 3.4.2:
# Mesa updated to the post-3.4.2 3.4 branch version as of November
2001.
The lates Mesa is 4.0.2 but the ebuild is not 'up to date' missing
support for 'opengl-update' and it shall work with al
To make the ebiuld for Mesa-4.0.[12] you need to support 'opengl-update'
see /usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/files/4.2.0-r9/opengl-update
, /usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/xfree-4.2.0-r9.ebuild
and /usr/portage/media-video/nvidia-glx/nvidia-glx-1.0.2880.ebuild
And you may need to relink all programs/libs that use opengl if you get
MesaOS support included.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-21 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-20 13:29 [gentoo-dev] Mesa >=3.5 masked!? José Fonseca
2002-05-20 21:14 ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-05-20 22:32 ` José Fonseca
2002-05-21 13:28 ` Lars S. Jensen [this message]
2002-05-21 15:44 ` José Fonseca
2002-05-21 15:56 ` José Fonseca
2002-05-21 21:51 ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-05-21 23:13 ` José Fonseca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1021987735.5875.72.camel@pegasus.lasj.dk \
--to=larssj@nospam.dk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox