From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from wired-networks.net (213-145-191-76.dd.nextgentel.com [213.145.191.76]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D322AC40A for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 19:53:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 18671 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 00:53:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maas) (192.168.0.2) by aleph.wired with SMTP; 15 May 2002 00:53:17 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild USE priority From: Erik Grinaker To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020515015348.2a5de662.spider@gentoo.org> References: <1021414998.4192.7.camel@maas.wired> <20020515015348.2a5de662.spider@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jQUVH6wulbU9HZYWsxaI" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 15 May 2002 02:44:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1021423469.6957.1.camel@maas.wired> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: e0cb7e3d-6364-4e30-ab8a-4349ddbdc02d X-Archives-Hash: bb09b1507a11c9ab7ee4751849b06d42 --=-jQUVH6wulbU9HZYWsxaI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 01:53, Spider wrote: > On 15 May 2002 00:23:18 +0200 > Erik Grinaker wrote: > > According to what I believe is common sense I would prioritize them as > > X, sdl, svga, ncurses - but is there a better way to do this, or do I > > just go by feeling? >=20 > I'd actually say:=20 > sdl, X, svga, ncurses ... =20 >=20 > mostly based on the fact that SDL is a layer over X=20 true - but when i tested it sdl was waaaaay slower than x - and as many users most probably have sdl enabled, perhaps without even knowing, i thought x would be a sensible default. --=20 Erik Grinaker Freelance UNIX/Linux systems consultant "Perfection is acheived not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away" - Antoine de Saint-Exup=E9ry --=-jQUVH6wulbU9HZYWsxaI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA84a9sbB7iYiY7YroRAkZXAJkBpvRpqOIe2hu8ErrR1hUIl31VyQCgi7hG yqBR8lqeN2q+UCm3LC/c6GM= =Vghv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jQUVH6wulbU9HZYWsxaI--