From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from coral.cfftechnologies.com (dsl081-147-127.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.147.127]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3114ABD50 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:41:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coral.cfftechnologies.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id 4CE6A12F9DA for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:41:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from d225.sosmarketplace.com (garm-x.sosmarketplace.com [63.98.0.66]) by coral.cfftechnologies.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id B5D7C12F87D for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:41:37 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New sys-kernel tree layout From: Avi Schwartz To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <3CC7198E.1010708@netcabo.pt> References: <2F4E8F809920D611B0B300508BDE95FEC54B@AFB91> <3CC7198E.1010708@netcabo.pt> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 24 Apr 2002 16:40:09 -0500 Message-Id: <1019684409.8362.126.camel@seahorse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20010714 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 206ddcf2-70c2-4258-9a49-26f563bc40b0 X-Archives-Hash: 43697a35bf127e0abaa6668bfb3c3d2a I used reiserfs on 4 different SuSE 7.2 installations and on two of them I ended up with a corrupt file system at one point or another. I am currently using ext3 on two Gentoo installation but I haven't used it long enough to form an opinion yet. Avi On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 15:46, Miguel S. Filipe wrote: > BoehmeSilvio wrote: > > >- reiserfs is not recommended (gentoo install documentation), or is it safe > >to use reiserfs now ?! > > > I never understood why gentoo says this about reiserfs. > reiserfs is actively mantained in the kernel tree, it's allways getting > updated and bugs are fixed every release, this for me is a signal that > it's being very tested, and the fact that it's in the main kernel tree > for some time, and I never saw in kerneltrap.com, or in any other web > page related to the kernel, or the kernel mailing list. -- Avi Schwartz avi@CFFtechnologies.com