From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DMARC_REJECT,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail2.tpgi.com.au (mail.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.58]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BF5ABD4F for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:20:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from spock.enterprise (ath1-56k-091.tpgi.com.au [202.7.187.91]) by mail2.tpgi.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3ICK9h03237 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:20:09 +1000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] LibPNG Problems :( From: Kevin Hayes To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 18 Apr 2002 22:19:46 +1000 Message-Id: <1019132388.8924.2.camel@spock.enterprise> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 84763afc-f452-4de4-92ce-31291c4db427 X-Archives-Hash: ee2d68964ef49b73cf7ddbafc53d0815 On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 08:08, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > Sorry, this solution is NOT acceptable. This pretty much says that I have > rebuild most of my graphics apps, and possibly X (which I recompiled it just > yesterday anyway during my upgrade to 1.1a). This is just WAY too time > consuming, and, simply put, it doesn't worth the trouble. I would expect > Gentoo LLC to find a better solutions for its users, especially if this > error was not a user error, but the maintener's. Asking poor cpu cycle users > to recompile everything, it is just not so good, don't you think? You could ask for your money back :)... -- Kevin Hayes