public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Grinaker <erikg@wired-networks.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQ
Date: 08 Apr 2002 22:22:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1018297368.4266.28.camel@maas.wired> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020408215909.03ad451d.thilo.bangert@gmx.net>

On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 21:59, Thilo Bangert wrote:

> > Hmmm... I've just experienced the joys of completely reinstalling a
> > server while it was actually running. That is, I installed gentoo on
> > it while I had the RedHat installation running - and just replaced
> > the services from the RedHat system with those from the Gentoo
> > chroot one by one until everything ran from the Gentoo installation.
> > I then did a quick reboot and had a fully functional Gentoo
> > replacement system running. Downtime was two minutes.
> > 
> 
> great - i plan on doing this myself.
> good to hear somebody already accomplished this...
> (amazing downtime!)

For a complete system reinstallation and reconfiguration including data
transfers i would say 2 minutes is rather nice, yeah :D try doing that
with redhat, debian or whatever (no flames, plz)


> > I can also contribute with maybe a bootdisk/netinstall and even a
> > more automated installation process for people not really knowing
> > what they are doing - if there is any interest for it
> 
> i've said this before: i wouldn't want to make it too easy for 
> people - thats what made gentoo really fun

True. However, I think the installation process is unneccessarily
complex, because you set up the gentoo environment manually, but all the
boot-scripts etc which really teach you the inner workings of linux are
automatically installed. Sure, newbies won't be afraid of recompiling
their kernel etc, but it's not a "complete" learning experience.

But I do know that the feeling most newbies have after installing it
will most certainly motivate them to play around some more with the
linux system (which is what you *should* do with linux; play around),
and this is definitely a good thing. I know I was pretty damn proud
after doing my first lfs install.

Anyways, you've probably had discussions on this before, so I'll just
leave it to the dev's.

> yes, a steep learning curve will scare some people away, but it will
>  make tech support much more easy (in the long)
> (perhaps this is all wrong, because then people just start
>  doing new stuff...)

hehe, well, there's really nothing stopping me, or anyone else, from
making a GentooEasyInstall(tm) disk/cd which does this, so I wouldn't
have that as my primary business model ;)


> also, gentoo is constantly under (more or less) heavy development
> (getting better every day). brave newbies have no problem dealing
> with that, but they can handle heavy documentation as well...
> 
> i don't want to kill your attempt on doing something good - i just
>  personally feel we should not lower the high standards (in terms
>  of dificulty or "heaviness") of the gentoo documentation

Also true, I just thought it would get some pressure off of the mailing
lists and make the gentoo install process a bit more flexible for people
who don't have the skills/creativity to do stuff like this - but if they
don't i guess they shouldn't be doing it in any case :)


> a dedicated gentoo floppy bootdisc really sounds like a good idea

Yup. I'll look into it, but no promises.

-- 

Erik Grinaker
Freelance UNIX/Linux systems consultant

"Perfection is acheived not when there is nothing more to add, but
rather when there is nothing more to take away"
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry




  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-08 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-06  4:49 [gentoo-dev] FAQ Glen Redden
2002-04-06  7:27 ` George Shapovalov
2002-04-05 22:44   ` Dan Armak
2002-04-06 19:30   ` Erik Grinaker
2002-04-06 19:44   ` Erik Grinaker
2002-04-07  4:29     ` George Shapovalov
2002-04-07 12:45   ` Erik Grinaker
2002-04-07 15:14     ` Spider
2002-04-06  8:14 ` Bjarke Sørensen
2002-04-08 19:17 ` Thilo Bangert
2002-04-08 19:39   ` Erik Grinaker
2002-04-08 19:59     ` Thilo Bangert
2002-04-08 20:22       ` Erik Grinaker [this message]
2002-04-08 20:28         ` Erik Grinaker
2002-04-08 20:47         ` Michael Frank
2002-04-08 21:40         ` Thilo Bangert
2002-04-09  0:27         ` Kain
2002-04-08 20:05     ` Michael Lang
2002-04-08 20:32       ` Erik Grinaker
2002-04-08 21:43     ` George Shapovalov
     [not found] <20020405200404.D8AFE20F0D8C@chiba.3jane.net>
2002-04-05 19:17 ` Glen Redden
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-05 18:15 Sean Mitchell
2002-04-05 18:27 ` Bjarke Sørensen
2002-04-05 20:02   ` George Shapovalov
     [not found] <20020404232306.D13FE20F0B2D@chiba.3jane.net>
2002-04-04 23:48 ` Glen Redden
2002-04-05  6:41   ` Geert Bevin
2001-09-10  8:44 Djamil ESSAISSI
2001-09-10  8:57 ` Einar Karttunen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1018297368.4266.28.camel@maas.wired \
    --to=erikg@wired-networks.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox