From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stefanajones@btinternet.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com (gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F3C20EF121
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 13:55:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from host217-39-64-244.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.39.64.244])
	by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 16ueIN-0000fB-00
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 19:55:15 +0100
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xemacs segfault
From: Stefan Jones <stefanajones@btinternet.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20020408080203.7C2B520EEAEA@chiba.3jane.net>
References: <20020408080203.7C2B520EEAEA@chiba.3jane.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 
Date: 08 Apr 2002 19:56:02 +0100
Message-Id: <1018292163.31245.4.camel@unicorn.stefanjones.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 426cf535-8dbf-4a1c-a730-d33ea776f316
X-Archives-Hash: 04c31ff3c62a43996c0a7e2abdcb3b42

	Also there is a quirk in the xemacs configure file:
		If you have wine installed then it thinks that it is compiling for
windows, thus fails. This happens as it detects /usr/lib/libgdi32.so,
thus thinking it is windows.




 
> > Has anyone been able to figure out why xemacs segfaults on startup?  As
> > mentioned before, if you are emerge-ing something, than xemacs will
> > actually run w/o segfaulting.  This is strange behavior. TIA,  Dave
> 
> Which version?
> Have you tried
> 
>   xemacs -debug-init
>   xemacs -vanilla
> 
> Also try running in the terminal with
> 
>   xemacs -nw
> 
> Perhaps these would help you to pin-point the problem...
> -- 
> Arcady Genkin
> Don't read everything you believe.
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 8
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff
> From: Stacey Keast <slik@telusplanet.net>
> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> Date: 07 Apr 2002 23:00:55 -0600
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:46, Spider wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> Of course it is going to take gcc3 longer to compile things with the new
> profiling code (see http://gcc.gnu.org/news/profiledriven.html)
> 
> All this basically is is the compiler running through code branches and
> identifying blocks which should be optimized to produce faster
> EXECUTABLES, this does not come at the price of faster COMPILE TIMES, as
> the compiler has to build these profiles to do more advanced
> optimizations.  So, you are really benchmarking the wrong thing here.
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 07:43:32 +0200 (CEST)
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress of kernel patches like grsecurity ?
> From: "Kim Nielsen" <kn@insecurity.dk>
> To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> >
> > Take a look at http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk/
> >
> > It's works fine under Gentoo.
> >
> But it's not in portage .. I was looking for kernel patches that Gentoo
> already has
> 
> /Kim
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 10
> From: "Mykhaylo Sorochan" <mihan@foss.kharkov.ua>
> To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:58:07 +0300
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] installing gentoo from i586.iso troubles
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DEDB.804E3E20
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="koi8-r"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Hi guys!
> 
> I have some problems in installing the Gentoo.
> I've been downloaded i586.iso of Gentoo Linux and tried o install it. I =
> have to say that I have access to Internet at my work and install Gentoo =
> on my home machine.
> So I have made all steps till making a boot and kernel. The problem is =
> that /etc/make.profile (/usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0) is absent and =
> emerge doesn't work. It seems that stage2(3)-i586 are incomplete. How I =
> can fix it without downloading anything from my home machine. Where I =
> can get that file and what else is absent there?
> 
> Thank you.
> Regards, Misha Sorochan.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DEDB.804E3E20
> Content-Type: text/html;
> 	charset="koi8-r"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dkoi8-r" http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3315.2870" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>Hi guys!</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>I have some problems in =
> installing the=20
> Gentoo.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>I've been downloaded i586.iso of =
> Gentoo Linux=20
> and tried o install it. I have to say that I have access to Internet at =
> my work=20
> and install Gentoo on my home machine.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>So I&nbsp;have made all steps =
> till making a=20
> boot and kernel. The problem is that /etc/make.profile=20
> (/usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0) is absent and emerge doesn't work. =
> It seems=20
> that stage2(3)-i586 are incomplete. How I can fix it without downloading =
> 
> anything from my home machine. Where I can get that file and what else =
> is absent=20
> there?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>Thank you.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>Regards, Misha=20
> Sorochan.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DEDB.804E3E20--
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:18:08 +0200
> From: Spider <spider@gentoo.org>
> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff
> Organization: Chaotic
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> --=.OV,BdVR8_98KPy
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> No, I'm not. :)
> 
> the "benchmark" as such was in response to peoples questions on wether
> gcc3.0 was faster or slower during compilation than gcc2.9  
> 
> For my own use, I think the results are well worth it now with gcc
> 3.0.4, especially since gcc now can be used to compile the kernel ;)
> (bugfix in gcc304) 
> 
> please take this the right way, I'm well aware of the improved results
> of gcc3 compared to gcc 2.9 , and why the slowdowns occur. (Check the
> memory usage of -Wall and other things and you'll be surprised)
> 
> 
> //Spider
> 
> 
> begin  quote
> On 07 Apr 2002 23:00:55 -0600
> Stacey Keast <slik@telusplanet.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:46, Spider wrote:
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Of course it is going to take gcc3 longer to compile things with the
> > new profiling code (see http://gcc.gnu.org/news/profiledriven.html)
> > 
> > All this basically is is the compiler running through code branches
> > and identifying blocks which should be optimized to produce faster
> > EXECUTABLES, this does not come at the price of faster COMPILE TIMES,
> > as the compiler has to build these profiles to do more advanced
> > optimizations.  So, you are really benchmarking the wrong thing here.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
> 
> --
> begin  happy99.exe
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
> end
> 
> --=.OV,BdVR8_98KPy
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE8sTYhXNNftdcUD70RAi2AAKCN18P8RHFi5BB9ttQxyXLOghL4iQCfYzoM
> wo4g0qSIHIzOPz9hpviKRxo=
> =YK+Z
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --=.OV,BdVR8_98KPy--
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 12
> From: George Shapovalov <georges@its.caltech.edu>
> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] installing gentoo from i586.iso troubles
> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 23:36:04 -0700
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> On Sunday 07 April 2002 22:58, Mykhaylo Sorochan wrote:
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > I have some problems in installing the Gentoo.
> > I've been downloaded i586.iso of Gentoo Linux and tried o install it. I
> > have to say that I have access to Internet at my work and install Gento=
> o on
> > my home machine. So I have made all steps till making a boot and kernel=
> =2E
> > The problem is that /etc/make.profile (/usr/portage/profiles/default-1.=
> 0)
> So, does that mean that the link is in place? (if no you need to create i=
> t=20
> anyway) and this is portage which is absent?
> Under normal conditions I would tell you do:
> emerge rsync (or even better emerge --clean rsync if you did that step at=
>  some=20
> point already). Since you do not have Internet access at home you need to=
> =20
> download portage tree and unpack it under /usr (so that /usr/portage is=20
> created).
> You can get it here:
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/snapshots.
> Please also check faq for more advice on how to use gentoo without a (fas=
> t)=20
> connection at home.
> 
> George
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 13
> From: thomas.mitzkat@t-online.de (Thomas Mitzkat)
> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 06:14:57 +0000
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] forbidden su under x
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> hello,
> 
> i don't find the switch to enable su in grafical terminal or to give 
> root-password to change time or date. please send me an info where i can 
> enable this, because this is not so pratice.
> 
> thanks a lot - fine system - 
> 
> 
> thomas
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 14
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] forbidden su under x
> From: Jens Blaesche <mr.big@pc-trouble.de>
> To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> Date: 08 Apr 2002 10:00:39 +0200
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> 
> Am Mon, 2002-04-08 um 08.14 schrieb Thomas Mitzkat:
> > hello,
> > 
> > i don't find the switch to enable su in grafical terminal or to give 
> > root-password to change time or date. please send me an info where i can 
> > enable this, because this is not so pratice.
> > 
> > thanks a lot - fine system - 
> > 
> > 
> > thomas
> Put the User in Group Wheel.
> 
> usermod -G wheel whateveruseryouwanttoadd
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
> 
> End of gentoo-dev Digest
-- 
Stefan Jones
Flat. 4, 46 Gold Street, Wellingborough, Northants, NN8 4QT
email: stefanajones@btinternet.com
tel: 01933 272991
mobile: 07900 432809