public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] help with readline confusion
Date: 17 Feb 2002 06:39:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1013920787.23189.6.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1013316107.28406.42.camel@gentoo.labs.darklight.sh>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1572 bytes --]

On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 06:41, Ilian Zarov wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 11:52, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> > My question has two parts. 1.I had expected that the "latest version
> > available" would show 4.2a, but it doesn't. I must be missing something
> > about how emerge determines which ebuild is the latest available. Is
> > 4.2a not to be used just right now?
> emerge checks if the packages is blocked (whether it is included in
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask). Blocked packages are usually
> broken/incomplete ebuilds or early alpha/beta versions of the specified
> application.
>  
> > 2. octave want's 4.2. I can satisfy it with an "ebuild
> > readline-4.2a.ebuild merge", but then I don't think i should, because if
> > users aren't getting 4.2 from an emerge, then I doubt I can expect them
> > to ebuild it manually when they emerge the octave package. Does this
> > logic sound right?
> 
> You should talk to an @gentoo.org developer about removing readline-4.2a
> from package.mask if you consider it stable enough (isn't this actually
> an alpha version ?). Not very sure of how the package.mask stuff is
> handled.

No, 4.2a was latest version at that time (not sure about
currently).

> > Many thanks,
> > 
> > Matt
>  
> 
> 	Best Regards,
> 		Ilian Zarov
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-17  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-09  9:52 [gentoo-dev] help with readline confusion Matthew Kennedy
2002-02-10  4:41 ` Ilian Zarov
2002-02-17  4:39   ` Martin Schlemmer [this message]
2002-02-17  4:35 ` Martin Schlemmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1013920787.23189.6.camel@nosferatu.lan \
    --to=azarah@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox