public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilian Zarov <coder@descom.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] help with readline confusion
Date: 10 Feb 2002 06:41:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1013316107.28406.42.camel@gentoo.labs.darklight.sh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1013248371.17757.14.camel@gentoo.shacknet.nu>

On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 11:52, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> My question has two parts. 1.I had expected that the "latest version
> available" would show 4.2a, but it doesn't. I must be missing something
> about how emerge determines which ebuild is the latest available. Is
> 4.2a not to be used just right now?
emerge checks if the packages is blocked (whether it is included in
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask). Blocked packages are usually
broken/incomplete ebuilds or early alpha/beta versions of the specified
application.
 
> 2. octave want's 4.2. I can satisfy it with an "ebuild
> readline-4.2a.ebuild merge", but then I don't think i should, because if
> users aren't getting 4.2 from an emerge, then I doubt I can expect them
> to ebuild it manually when they emerge the octave package. Does this
> logic sound right?

You should talk to an @gentoo.org developer about removing readline-4.2a
from package.mask if you consider it stable enough (isn't this actually
an alpha version ?). Not very sure of how the package.mask stuff is
handled.
> Many thanks,
> 
> Matt
 

	Best Regards,
		Ilian Zarov



  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-10  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-09  9:52 [gentoo-dev] help with readline confusion Matthew Kennedy
2002-02-10  4:41 ` Ilian Zarov [this message]
2002-02-17  4:39   ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-02-17  4:35 ` Martin Schlemmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1013316107.28406.42.camel@gentoo.labs.darklight.sh \
    --to=coder@descom.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox