From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DMARC_REJECT,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from uranus.u235.eyep.net (ADSLP220-NV64A-p74.adsl.netvision.net.il [212.143.220.74]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AF651200B28F for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:27:50 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 15979 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Feb 2002 06:26:37 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild info: author, maintainer and copyrights From: Vitaly Kushneriuk To: Gentoo-dev In-Reply-To: <20020208002757.GA782@silence> References: <1012709407.23922.0.camel@gentoo.labs.darklight.sh> <1013101706.10718.56.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net> <1013109724.21877.153.camel@inventor.gentoo.org> <20020207174029.9618A1721A@www.aleph-null.tv> <1013114663.10720.73.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net> <20020208002757.GA782@silence> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 08 Feb 2002 08:26:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1013149597.15937.10.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: a775215b-9ee5-4677-a5d6-21d90a16b145 X-Archives-Hash: 4b9790f5184cfdbf82c846e6d8c72350 > What _real_ difference does it make? The only difference is that > Gentoo Technologies, Inc. can't relicense it and make a closed-source > version. However, if it was possible for them, and if they did, everybody > could just ignore them and continue working on the last version released > under the GPL. The point is not that you can't fork the project. You'r right at that you always can, if it's licensed under GPL. The point is preserving the future "free" status of _all_ derivative works as well. If you don't care about that, you can just put all the work in "public domain".