Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Perl CPAN.pm and portage (Bug 551 or "Can't we all get along?")

[Patrick Flaherty <patrick_flaherty@c-i-s.com>]

I'd be interested in at least monitoring the progess of devlopment. I'd
love to help out but i'm not sure how much time i have for it, buy hey
i'll probly get sucked in after a few emails -=] 

--
pack

On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 11:05, JR Boyens wrote:
> Sounds interesting, if your willing to help with an implementation I
> would suppose that we could get something together. Let me know on or
> off the list and we'll set something up.
> 
> Anyone else interested?
> 
> --
> JR Boyens
> jboyens@iastate.edu
> 
> On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 09:55, Tod M. Neidt wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Was looking at Bug 551 ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=551 )
> > this morning.  I believe this particular error was generated because the
> > user was downloading and install additional perl modules using the
> > CPAN.pm module that comes with the perl-5.6.1 package, but didn't have
> > the required perl module dependency libnet installed prior to installing
> > the telnet module.  Info on the CPAN.pm module can be found at
> > http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/CPAN/perl/CPAN.html
> > 
> > Note: I successfully merged the dev-perl/Net-Telnet ebuild using portage
> > and the dev-perl/libnet ebuild was merged first like it is supposed to
> > so this really isn't a portage or ebuild issue.
> > 
> > However, this situation does bring up an interesting question regarding
> > a possible enhancement.
> > 
> > Would it be possible (or even desirable) to hack CPAN.pm and/or portage
> > so that they play nice together, i.e. a user could find and download
> > perl modules using CPAN.pm and portage would provide the installation
> > and package management?
> > 
> > 
> > Some Advantages:
> > 
> > 1. Useful feature for Gentoo users accustomed to enhancing perl with
> > modules through the CPAN.pm module.
> > 
> > 2. Possibility to effectively eleminate the dev-perl portage category,
> > while at the same time, (less burden on Gentoo.org servers, and perl
> > module ebuild maintainers) 
> > 
> > 3. providing *all* the perl modules archived at cpan (the archive) to
> > Gentoo users.
> > 
> > 4. Cool hack :)
> > 
> > 
> > Some Disadvantages:
> > 
> > 1. Extra work maintaining a CPAN.pm-gentoo.diff
> > 
> > 2. perl <--> python interface might be difficult?
> > 
> > 3. package management accounting if both perl module ebuilds and CPAN.pm
> > installations are tracked in /var/db/pkg/
> > 
> > As I am not worthy to wash the feet of a perl deity, I am interested in
> > the thoughts of those who are.
> > 
> > tod
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev