public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kushneriuk <vitaly_kushneriuk@yahoo.com>
To: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild info: author, maintainer and copyrights
Date: 07 Feb 2002 19:08:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1013101706.10718.56.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020207111225.B414367@plato.zk3.dec.com>

On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 18:12, Chris Houser wrote:
> Vitaly Kushneriuk wrote:              [Sun Feb  3 2002, 12:37:17AM EST]         
> > An yes, you can leave the copyright to yourself. 
> 
> Acutally, I believe that we want all ebuilds in the official
> /usr/portage to be GPL and Copyright by Gentoo Inc.  GPL protects the
> ebuild authors from Gentoo having too much control over their work, but
> the Gentoo Copyright gives us some flexibility in handling the hundreds
> of files from different authors.
> 
> Do I have this wrong?
Yes. you do have this wrong ;)
First of all, once contributions are GPL-ed , the fact that you do not
own the copyright does not prevent you from distributing/modifying etc.
So having all copyright go to Gentoo Inc. will not make your life easier
if you want to continue the open-souce path.

Second, you _can_not_ *require* contributors to give up their copyright.
People can actualy get concerned about the Gentoo feature and intentions
if you do. _If_ Gentoo Inc. will have all the copyrights, then _nothing_
will prevent it one day changing the license for all _future_ versions.
The fact that no single entity/person has all the copyright is
a Good Thing (tm).

	/Vitaly


  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-07 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-03  4:10 [gentoo-dev] Ebuild info: author, maintainer and copyrights Ilian Zarov
2002-02-03  5:37 ` Vitaly Kushneriuk
2002-02-07 16:12   ` Chris Houser
2002-02-07 17:08     ` Vitaly Kushneriuk [this message]
2002-02-07 19:22       ` Daniel Robbins
2002-02-07 19:46         ` mbutcher
2002-02-07 20:44           ` Vitaly Kushneriuk
2002-02-07 21:27             ` Daniel Robbins
2002-02-08  0:27             ` Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt
2002-02-08  6:26               ` Vitaly Kushneriuk
2002-02-08 14:06                 ` Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt
2002-02-08 18:36                   ` Vitaly Kushneriuk
2002-02-08 14:21                     ` Bob Phan
2002-02-07 20:48           ` Daniel Robbins
2002-02-07 20:43             ` mbutcher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-08 14:21 Sean Mitchell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1013101706.10718.56.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net \
    --to=vitaly_kushneriuk@yahoo.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox