* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is it acceptable to use 'sed' in ebuild scripts?
2002-02-05 12:41 [gentoo-dev] Is it acceptable to use 'sed' in ebuild scripts? Bob Phan
@ 2002-02-05 7:18 ` Einar Karttunen
2002-02-05 16:05 ` Tod M. Neidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Einar Karttunen @ 2002-02-05 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 05.02.02 07:41 -0500(+0000), Bob Phan wrote:
> Hello, I've just recently created an ebuild for nethack (put it in
> app-games/nethack), however, it's build does not use the standard GNU
> autoconf/automake system, but rather forces you to manually edit a config.h
> file. Currently, I have just made a patch for X support that is applied when
> you "use X". I would like to add Qt and GNOME optional support, but using
> patches, it is very difficult to have one without the other, or the context
> will not match (very messy). I was instead wondering if using 'sed' within
> ebuild scripts was accepted practice, or if I should stick a dependancy for
> sed at the top of the file.
Yes, many ebuilds use sed
find /usr/portage/ -name '*ebuild' -exec grep -l 'sed -e' '{}' ';' 2>/dev/null|cut -d/ -f-5|uniq|wc -l
300
So I don't think it will be banned in the near future.
> Thanks for any help. I plan on writing a few more (hopefully more trivial)
> ebuild scripts for any other software I run across. Also, where should I
> submit the ebuild after it's ready?
bugs.gentoo.org
- Einar Karttunen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Is it acceptable to use 'sed' in ebuild scripts?
@ 2002-02-05 12:41 Bob Phan
2002-02-05 7:18 ` Einar Karttunen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bob Phan @ 2002-02-05 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Dev
Hello, I've just recently created an ebuild for nethack (put it in
app-games/nethack), however, it's build does not use the standard GNU
autoconf/automake system, but rather forces you to manually edit a config.h
file. Currently, I have just made a patch for X support that is applied when
you "use X". I would like to add Qt and GNOME optional support, but using
patches, it is very difficult to have one without the other, or the context
will not match (very messy). I was instead wondering if using 'sed' within
ebuild scripts was accepted practice, or if I should stick a dependancy for
sed at the top of the file.
Thanks for any help. I plan on writing a few more (hopefully more trivial)
ebuild scripts for any other software I run across. Also, where should I
submit the ebuild after it's ready?
Thanks again,
Bob
PS. Great distro. It's the first I have yet to use where I haven't
immediately found something I disliked, on top of its many other
merits. Good work!
--
/*
* Bob Phan <bob@evil-core.com,rphan@nrgn.com>
* Computational Chemistry Informatics
* Neurogen Corporation
* (203)488-8201 x4645
*
* To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.
*/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is it acceptable to use 'sed' in ebuild scripts?
2002-02-05 7:18 ` Einar Karttunen
@ 2002-02-05 16:05 ` Tod M. Neidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tod M. Neidt @ 2002-02-05 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 01:18, Einar Karttunen wrote:
> On 05.02.02 07:41 -0500(+0000), Bob Phan wrote:
> > Hello, I've just recently created an ebuild for nethack (put it in
> > app-games/nethack), however, it's build does not use the standard GNU
> > autoconf/automake system, but rather forces you to manually edit a config.h
> > file. Currently, I have just made a patch for X support that is applied when
> > you "use X". I would like to add Qt and GNOME optional support, but using
> > patches, it is very difficult to have one without the other, or the context
> > will not match (very messy). I was instead wondering if using 'sed' within
> > ebuild scripts was accepted practice, or if I should stick a dependancy for
> > sed at the top of the file.
>
> Yes, many ebuilds use sed
> find /usr/portage/ -name '*ebuild' -exec grep -l 'sed -e' '{}' ';' 2>/dev/null|cut -d/ -f-5|uniq|wc -l
> 300
> So I don't think it will be banned in the near future.
>
As Einar said, many ebuilds use 'sed'. A particularly good example that
you might want to take a look at is dev-lang/python-2.2-r4.
Hope that helps,
tod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-05 16:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-05 12:41 [gentoo-dev] Is it acceptable to use 'sed' in ebuild scripts? Bob Phan
2002-02-05 7:18 ` Einar Karttunen
2002-02-05 16:05 ` Tod M. Neidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox